PRECISION OF NEUTRON-SCATTERING AND CAPACITANCE TYPE SOIL-WATER CONTENT GAUGES FROM FIELD CALIBRATION

被引:183
作者
EVETT, SR [1 ]
STEINER, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS,SO PIEDMONT CONSERVAT RES CTR,WATKINSVILLE,GA 30677
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900040001x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 [农业资源与环境]; 090301 [土壤学];
摘要
Soil water content gauges based on neutron scattering (NS) have been a valuable tool for soil water investigations for some 40 yr. However, licensing, training, and safety regulations pertaining to the radioactive source in these gauges makes their use expensive and prevents use In some situations such as unattended monitoring. A capacitance probe (CP) gauge has characteristics that would seem to make it an ideal replacement for NS gauges. We determined the relative precision of two brands of NS gauges (three gauges of each) and a brand of CP gauge (four gauges) in a field calibration exercise. Both brands of NS gauges were calibrated vs. volumetric soil water content with coefficients of determination (r(2)) ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 and root mean squared errors (RMSE) <0.012 m(3) m(-3) water content. Calibrations for the CP gauges resulted in r(2) ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 and RMSE of 0.036 m(3) m(-3) water content. Average 95% confidence intervals on predictions were three to five times higher for the CP gauges than for the NS gauges, ranging from 0.153 to 0.161 and 0.032 to 0.052 m(3) m(-3), respectively. Although poorly correlated with soil water content, readings were reproducible among the four CP gauges. The poor correlation for CP gauges may be due to small-scale soil water content variations within the measurement volume of the gauge. The NS gauges provide acceptable precision but the CP gauge has poor precision and is unacceptable for routine soil water content measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:961 / 968
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
Allen R. G., 1993, MANAGEMENT IRRIGATIO, P1120
[2]
SOIL-MOISTURE MEASUREMENT BY AN IMPROVED CAPACITANCE TECHNIQUE .2. FIELD TECHNIQUES, EVALUATION AND CALIBRATION [J].
BELL, JP ;
DEAN, TJ ;
HODNETT, MG .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1987, 93 (1-2) :79-90
[3]
BOOTAR, 1964, ASTM RILEM S APPL AD, P3
[4]
SOIL-MOISTURE MEASUREMENT BY AN IMPROVED CAPACITANCE TECHNIQUE .1. SENSOR DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE [J].
DEAN, TJ ;
BELL, JP ;
BATY, AJB .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1987, 93 (1-2) :67-78
[5]
DETERMINATION OF SOIL MOISTURE BY NEUTRON SCATTERING [J].
GARDNER, W ;
KIRKHAM, D .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1952, 73 (05) :391-401
[6]
GARDNER WH, 1986, AGRONOMY, V9, P493, DOI DOI 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.1.2ED.C21
[7]
Greacen E. L., 1981, SOIL WATER ASSESSMEN
[8]
MICROWAVE DIELECTRIC BEHAVIOR OF WET SOIL .1. EMPIRICAL-MODELS AND EXPERIMENTAL-OBSERVATIONS [J].
HALLIKAINEN, MT ;
ULABY, FT ;
DOBSON, MC ;
ELRAYES, MA ;
WU, LK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1985, 23 (01) :25-34
[9]
HEATHMAN GC, 1993, ASAE931053 PAP
[10]
KURAZ V, 1981, GEOTECH TEST J, V4, P111