DISCUSSION OF EXPERIMENTAL PROOF FOR THE PARADOX OF EINSTEIN, ROSEN, AND PODOLSKY

[1] BOHM D, 1952, PHYS REV, V85, P166, DOI 10.1103/PhysRev.85.166

[2] A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF HIDDEN VARIABLES .2. [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1952, 85 (02): : 180 - 193

[3] Bohm D, 1951, QUANTUM THEORY

[4] BOHM D, 1957, CAUSALITY CHANCE MOD, pCH3

[5] Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1935, 48 (08): : 696 - 702

[6] Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1935, 47 (10): : 0777 - 0780

[7] Remarks on measurements in quantum theory [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1936, 49 (06): : 0476 - 0476

[8] Note on the quantum-mechanical theory of measurement [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1936, 49 (05): : 0393 - 0399

[9] HEITLER W, 1954, QUANTUM THEORY RAD, P269

[10] SCHILPP PA, 1949, ALBERT EINSTEIN PHIL, pCH7

[1] BOHM D, 1952, PHYS REV, V85, P166, DOI 10.1103/PhysRev.85.166

[2] A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF HIDDEN VARIABLES .2. [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1952, 85 (02): : 180 - 193

[3] Bohm D, 1951, QUANTUM THEORY

[4] BOHM D, 1957, CAUSALITY CHANCE MOD, pCH3

[5] Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1935, 48 (08): : 696 - 702

[6] Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1935, 47 (10): : 0777 - 0780

[7] Remarks on measurements in quantum theory [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1936, 49 (06): : 0476 - 0476

[8] Note on the quantum-mechanical theory of measurement [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1936, 49 (05): : 0393 - 0399

[9] HEITLER W, 1954, QUANTUM THEORY RAD, P269

[10] SCHILPP PA, 1949, ALBERT EINSTEIN PHIL, pCH7