AUDITORY STIMULUS-INTENSITY RESPONSES AND FRONTAL MIDLINE THETA RHYTHM

被引:37
作者
BRUNEAU, N
ROUX, S
GUERIN, P
GARREAU, B
LELORD, G
机构
[1] INSERM U 316, Département de Psychopathologie et de Neurophysiologie du Développement, CHRU Bretonneau
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1993年 / 86卷 / 03期
关键词
AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIALS; STIMULUS INTENSITY; N1; COMPONENT; FRONTAL EEG THETA RHYTHM;
D O I
10.1016/0013-4694(93)90010-S
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The influence of stimulus intensity on the N1 component of auditory evoked potentials recorded at fronto-central sites was investigated in respect to the spectral components of the EEG recorded at Cz, Fz and Oz. The study was performed on 14 healthy adult subjects. The only EEG frequency bandwidth that was strongly correlated with the N1 amplitude-intensity slope was the theta rhythm, particularly the 5-7 Hz frequencies recorded at Cz and Fz. This frequency bandwidth corresponds to the previously described frontal midline theta rhythm related to performance of tests that require continuous concentration of attention. Our results show that the steeper the slope, the greater the amount of Fmtheta. This suggests that the interindividual differences in the N1 amplitude/intensity slope could be related to interindividual differences in attentional readiness toward the auditory stimuli, even when delivered in ''passive'' conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 216
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ADLER G, 1989, AUDIOLOGY, V28, P316
[2]  
Baribeau J C, 1987, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl, V40, P68
[3]  
Beagley H. A., 1969, INT AUDIOL, V8, P345, DOI 10.3109/05384916909079077
[4]   FRONTAL AUDITORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS AND AUGMENTING-REDUCING [J].
BRUNEAU, N ;
ROUX, S ;
GARREAU, B ;
LELORD, G .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (05) :364-371
[5]   FRONTAL AUDITORY-EVOKED POTENTIAL AUGMENTING-REDUCING AND URINARY HOMOVANILLIC-ACID [J].
BRUNEAU, N ;
BARTHELEMY, C ;
JOUVE, J ;
LELORD, G .
NEUROPSYCHOBIOLOGY, 1986, 16 (2-3) :78-84
[6]   INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN STIMULUS INTENSITY RESPONSE [J].
BUCHSBAUM, M ;
PFEFFERBAUM, A .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1971, 8 (05) :600-+
[7]  
BUCHSBAUM M, 1973, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V7, P199
[8]  
Buchsbaum M, 1976, CONSCIOUSNESS SELF R, P101, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-2568-0_3
[9]   CATECHOLAMINES AND ATTENTION .1. ANIMAL AND CLINICAL-STUDIES [J].
CLARK, CR ;
GEFFEN, GM ;
GEFFEN, LB .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 1987, 11 (04) :341-352
[10]   CATECHOLAMINES AND ATTENTION .2. PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES IN NORMAL HUMANS [J].
CLARK, CR ;
GEFFEN, GM ;
GEFFEN, LB .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 1987, 11 (04) :353-364