OPTIMAL DIET SELECTION BY A GENERALIST GRAZING HERBIVORE

被引:98
作者
NEWMAN, JA
PARSONS, AJ
THORNLEY, JHM
PENNING, PD
KREBS, JR
机构
[1] UNIV OXFORD,DEPT ZOOL,AFRC,ECOL & BEHAV UNIT,OXFORD OX1 3PS,ENGLAND
[2] BBSRC INST GRASSLAND & ENVIRONM RES,N WYKE RES STN,OKEHAMPTON EX20 2SB,DEVON,ENGLAND
[3] NERC,INST TERR ECOL,PENICUIK EH26 0QB,MIDLOTHIAN,SCOTLAND
关键词
CLOVER SHEEP; RYEGRASS; STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING;
D O I
10.2307/2390572
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. We develop a stochastic dynamic programming model of grazing behaviour for a generalist mammalian herbivore. The model considers that behaviour depends upon three state variables: stored energy, disgestible gut fill and indigestible gut fill. When the plant community comprises two alternative species, the animal must choose between five alternative behaviours: grazing species i, grazing species j, grazing whichever species it encounters, resting or ruminating. 2. We use the model to distinguish diet preference and diet selection. Diet preference is the diet selected by the animal when it is operating under a minimum of environmental constraints and diet selection refers to the way in which environmental constraints modify the animal's diet preference. 3. Although the model can be used for any mammal grazing in any plant community, we demonstrate solutions derived from parameter values relevant to sheep grazing a grass-clover plant community. 4. The model demonstrates that diet preference may depend on the relative intake rates of the two alternative plant species. Furthermore, preference may depend on the absolute intake rates at which the relative comparison is made. The model demonstrates that the optimal diet should have a temporal pattern across the day and that it may be sensitive to predation hazard. The model also predicts total daily intake. 5. We use the model to demonstrate that the complex patterns of diet preference are further modified when considering total abundance of species in the community (e.g. cover). 6. We explain how the model is heuristic in pointing out reasons why the literature on diet selection in this system, and in herbivores more generally, is equivocal on what is the basis of selection and preference.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 268
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
ALDERMAN G, 1984, 433 MIN AGR FISH FOO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, NUTRIENT REQUIREMENT
[3]  
ARNOLD G. W., 1960, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, V11, P1034, DOI 10.1071/AR9601034
[4]   INFLUENCE OF THE BIOMASS, BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND SWARD HEIGHT OF ANNUAL PASTURES ON FORAGING BEHAVIOR BY SHEEP [J].
ARNOLD, GW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1987, 24 (03) :759-772
[5]  
BEDNEKOFF PA, 1995, BEHAVIOUR, V129, P1
[6]  
Bellman R. E., 1957, DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
[7]  
BELOVSKY GE, 1981, THEORETICAL POPULATI, V14, P76
[8]   FACTORS AFFECTING DIET SELECTION BY SHEEP .2. HEIGHT AND DENSITY OF PASTURE [J].
BLACK, JL ;
KENNEY, PA .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1984, 35 (04) :565-578
[9]   THE NEED FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSES OF DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION MODELS [J].
GLADSTEIN, DS .
OIKOS, 1991, 60 (01) :121-126
[10]   BEHAVIORAL-PATTERNS OF DOMESTIC SHEEP AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO COYOTE PREDATION [J].
GLUESING, EA ;
BALPH, DF ;
KNOWLTON, FF .
APPLIED ANIMAL ETHOLOGY, 1980, 6 (04) :315-330