BRANCHING RESTRICTIONS AND BANKING COSTS

被引:6
作者
BUONO, MJ
EAKIN, BK
机构
[1] UNIV OREGON,DEPT ECON,EUGENE,OR 97403
[2] FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP,RESTON,VA 22090
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0378-4266(90)90006-N
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Previous research of banking costs has been limited by the choice of the functional form, irregularities in the estimated cost functions, and a failure to rigorously examine the difference between banks in branching states and banks in unit-banking states. This paper addresses these shortcomings. Banks are modelled as three-input-three-output cost minimizing firms. A three equation system is estimated using 1985 Functional Cost Analysis data. The findings indicate that banks in unit-banking states experience diseconomies of scale Banks in branching states experience diseconomies of scale at the bank level but economies of scale at the branch level. We also find evidence of economies of scope for branch-state banks but not for unit-state banks. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1162
页数:12
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Baumol W., 1982, CONTESTABLE MARKETS
[2]  
Benston G.J., 1965, NATIONAL BANKING REV, V2, P507
[3]   SCALE ECONOMIES IN BANKING - A RESTRUCTURING AND REASSESSMENT [J].
BENSTON, GJ ;
HANWECK, GA ;
HUMPHREY, DB .
JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 1982, 14 (04) :435-456
[4]  
BENSTON GJ, 1983, EC SCALE SCOPE BANKI
[5]   COMPETITIVE VIABILITY IN BANKING - SCALE, SCOPE, AND PRODUCT MIX ECONOMIES [J].
BERGER, AN ;
HANWECK, GA ;
HUMPHREY, DB .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1987, 20 (03) :501-520
[6]  
Blackorby C., 1978, DUALITY SEPARABILITY
[7]   FLEXIBLE COST-FUNCTIONS FOR MULTIPRODUCT FIRMS [J].
CAVES, DW ;
CHRISTENSEN, LR ;
TRETHEWAY, MW .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1980, 62 (03) :477-481
[9]   SCALE AND SCOPE ECONOMIES IN THE MULTI-PRODUCT BANKING FIRM [J].
GILLIGAN, T ;
SMIRLOCK, M ;
MARSHALL, W .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1984, 13 (03) :393-405
[10]   A COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF 3 FLEXIBLE FUNCTIONAL FORMS [J].
GUILKEY, DK ;
LOVELL, CAK ;
SICKLES, RC .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1983, 24 (03) :591-616