EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE WORKLOAD ON SPEECH PRODUCTION - ACOUSTIC ANALYSES AND PERCEPTUAL CONSEQUENCES

被引:71
作者
LIVELY, SE [1 ]
PISONI, DB [1 ]
VANSUMMERS, W [1 ]
BERNACKI, RH [1 ]
机构
[1] INDIANA UNIV, DEPT PSYCHOL, SPEECH RES LAB, BLOOMINGTON, IN 47405 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.405815
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The present investigation examined the effects of cognitive workload on speech production. Workload was manipulated by having talkers perform a compensatory visual tracking task while speaking test sentences of the form ''Say hVd again.'' Acoustic measurements were made to compare utterances produced under workload with the same utterances produced in a control condition. In the workload condition, some talkers produced utterances with increased amplitude and amplitude variability, decreased spectral tilt and F0 variability and increased speaking rate. No changes in F1, F2, or F3 were observed across conditions for any of the talkers. These findings indicate both laryngeal and sublaryngeal adjustments in articulation, as well as modifications in the absolute timing of articulatory gestures. The results of a perceptual identification experiment paralleled the acoustic measurements. Small but significant advantages in intelligibility were observed for utterances produced under workload for talkers who showed robust changes in speech production. Changes in amplitude and amplitude variability for utterances produced under workload appeared to be the major factor controlling intelligibility. The results of the present investigation support the assumptions of Lindblom's [''Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory,'' in Speech Production and Speech Modeling (Klewer Academic, The Netherlands, 1990)] H&H model: Talkers adapt their speech to suit the demands of the environment and these modifications are designed to maximize intelligibility.
引用
收藏
页码:2962 / 2973
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS EVALUATOR - 2 TESTS OF A VOCAL MEASURE [J].
BRENNER, M ;
BRANSCOMB, HH ;
SCHWARTZ, GE .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 16 (04) :351-357
[2]  
Brenner M, 1985, VOCAL FOLD PHYSL BIO, P239
[3]  
BRENNER M, 1988, NASA C PUBLICATION, V2504, P363
[4]  
Chen F. R., 1980, THESIS MIT CAMBRIDGE
[5]   EFFECTS OF AMBIENT NOISE ON SPEAKER INTELLIGIBILITY FOR WORDS AND PHRASES [J].
DREHER, JJ ;
ONEILL, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1957, 29 (12) :1320-1323
[6]  
GRIFFIN GR, 1987, AVIAT SPACE ENVIR MD, V58, P1165
[7]   Effect of Level of Distracting Noise upon Speaking Rate, Duration and Intensity [J].
Hanley, T. D. ;
Steer, M. D. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1949, 14 (04) :363-368
[8]  
Hansen J. H. L., 1988, THESIS GEORGIA I TEC
[9]   MANIFESTATIONS OF TASK-INDUCED STRESS IN ACOUSTIC SPEECH SIGNAL [J].
HECKER, MHL ;
STEVENS, KN ;
VONBISMA.G ;
WILLIAMS, CE .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1968, 44 (04) :993-&
[10]   A CRITICAL TRACKING TASK FOR MANUAL CONTROL RESEARCH [J].
JEX, HR ;
MCDONNEL.JD ;
PHATAK, AV .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN FACTORS IN ELECTRONICS, 1966, HFE7 (04) :138-+