RELATIONS BETWEEN VALUES, ATTITUDES, AND BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS - THE MODERATING ROLE OF ATTITUDE FUNCTION

被引:145
作者
MAIO, GR
OLSON, JM
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jesp.1995.1013
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A manipulation of attitude function was used to test the hypotheses that attitude function moderates (a) the strength of relations between values and attitudes, (b) the pattern of relations between values and attitudes, and (c) the role of values in the prediction of behavioral intentions. Attitude function was manipulated by making salient either utilitarian or value-expressive reasons for attitudes toward donating to cancer research. We then measured subjects' attitudes toward donating to cancer research, their perceived control over donating, their subjective norms regarding donating, and their intentions to donate in the future. Results indicated that subjects in the value-expressive attitude condition exhibited significant value-attitude relations, whereas subjects in the utilitarian attitude condition did not. In addition, subjects in the value-expressive attitude condition exhibited a pattern of value-attitude relations that was consistent with Schwartz's (1992, in press) model of value associations, whereas subjects in the utilitarian attitude condition did not exhibit such a pattern. Finally, for subjects in the value-expressive attitude condition, values predicted intentions to donate even when attitudes, norms, and perceptions of control were entered into the equation, whereas subjects in the utilitarian attitude condition did not manifest any relation between values and intentions. The results reveal that the construct of attitude function can be an important guide for predicting when values will be important predictors of attitudes and behavioral intentions. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 285
页数:20
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Ajzen I., 1988, ATTITUDES PERSONALIT
[2]   PREDICTING DISHONEST ACTIONS USING THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
BECK, L ;
AJZEN, I .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1991, 25 (03) :285-301
[3]  
Eagly A. H., 1993, J LOSS PREVENT PROC
[4]   ATTITUDE ACCESSIBILITY, ATTITUDE BEHAVIOR CONSISTENCY, AND THE STRENGTH OF THE OBJECT EVALUATION ASSOCIATION [J].
FAZIO, RH ;
CHEN, J ;
MCDONEL, EC ;
SHERMAN, SJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 18 (04) :339-357
[5]  
Fazio RH, 1989, ATTITUDE STRUCTURE F, P153
[6]  
FEATHER N T, 1982, Motivation and Emotion, V6, P217, DOI 10.1007/BF00992246
[7]  
Fishbein M, 1975, BELIEF ATTITUDE INTE
[8]   MORAL OBLIGATION AND ATTITUDES - THEIR RELATION TO BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS [J].
GORSUCH, RL ;
ORTBERG, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 44 (05) :1025-1028
[9]   THE INSTRUMENTALITY OF ATTITUDES - TOWARD A NEOFUNCTIONAL THEORY [J].
HEREK, GM .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1986, 42 (02) :99-114