INADEQUACY OF DIPSTICK PROTEINURIA IN HYPERTENSIVE PREGNANCY

被引:57
作者
BROWN, MA
BUDDLE, ML
机构
[1] Departments of Renal Medicine and Medicine, St. George Hospital and University of New South Wales
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1479-828X.1995.tb02143.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of ward urinalysis and the sensitivity of dipstick testing in the assessment of proteinuria in hypertensive pregnant women. Subjects were 230 consecutive hypertensive pregnant women who were admitted to hospital over a 2-year period. Routine ward urinalyses for protein, obtained on a mid-stream sample before and after a 24-hour urine collection for quantitating proteinuria, were compared with the 24-hour urine protein excretion. As a control for dipstick accuracy, urinalysis was also performed on a mixed aliquot of each of the 24-hour samples by a single observer experienced in urinalysis. True proteinuria was considered as >300 mg/day. The positive predictive value for urinalysis ranged from 38% (for the precollection test) to 60% (for tests on the aliquot). Negative predictive values were 86-88%. The false negative rates at 'nil' or 'trace' proteinuria ranged from 8-18%. The false positive rates at '3+' (3 g/L) or '4+' (greater than or equal to 20 g/L) ranged from 0-17%, at '2+' (1 g/L) from 18-50% and at '1+' (0.3 g/L) from 67-83%. Best results for urinalysis were obtained on the aliquot testing but even under these ideal circumstances there was a high false positive rate (67%) at '1+' (0.3 g/L) urinalysis level. These studies show that in routine clinical practice 'nil' or 'trace' proteinuria will miss significant proteinuria in approximately 1 out of 8 hypertensive pregnant women while '3+'(3 g/L) or '4+'(greater than or equal to 20 g/L) will rarely be a false positive. At urinalysis of '1+' or '2+' a 24-hour urine collection is required to be certain about the presence or absence of proteinuria. Research studies should demand 24-hour urine protein quantitation and not rely solely upon urinalysis results.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 369
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Chua S, Redman CWG., Prognosis for pre‐eclampsia complicated by 5 g or more of proteinuria in 24 hours, Europ J Obstet Gynaecol, 43, pp. 9-12, (1992)
  • [2] Ferrazzani S, Caruso A, de Carolis S, Martino IV, Mancuso S., Proteinuria and outcome of 444 pregnancies complicated by hypertension, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 162, pp. 366-371, (1990)
  • [3] Brown MA, Buddie ML., The importance of non‐proteinuric hypertension in pregnancy, Hypertension in Pregnancy, 14, pp. 57-65, (1995)
  • [4] Jaschevatzky OE, Rosenburg RP, Shalit A, Zonder HB, Grunstein S., Protein/creatinine ratio in random urine specimens for quantitation of proteinuria in preeclampsia, Obstet Gynecol, 75, pp. 604-606, (1990)
  • [5] Kuo VS, Koumantakis G, Gallery EDM., Proteinuria and its assessment in normal and hypertensive pregnancy, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 167, pp. 723-728, (1992)
  • [6] Meyer NL, Mercer BM, Friedman SA, Sibai BM., Urinary dipstick protein: a poor predictor of absent or severe proteinuria, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 170, pp. 137-141, (1994)
  • [7] Lindow SW, Davey DA., The variability of urinary protein and creatinine excretion in patients with gestational proteinuric hypertension, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 99, pp. 869-872, (1992)
  • [8] Ralston SH, Caine N, Richards I, O'Reilly D, Sturrock RD, Capell HA., Screening for proteinuria in a Rheumatology Clinic: comparison of dipstick testing, 24 hour urine quantitative protein, and proteinuria/creatinine ratio in random urine samples, Annals Rheum Dis, 47, pp. 759-763, (1988)