MODIFICATION OF S-1 SUBSITE SPECIFICITY IN THE CYSTEINE PROTEASE CATHEPSIN-B

被引:17
作者
FOX, T
MASON, P
STORER, AC
MORT, JS
机构
[1] SHRINERS HOSP CRIPPLED CHILDREN,JOINT DIS LAB,MONTREAL,PQ H3G 1A6,CANADA
[2] NATL RES COUNCIL CANADA,BIOTECHNOL RES INST,PHARMACEUT BIOTECHNOL SECTOR,MONTREAL,PQ H4P 2R2,CANADA
来源
PROTEIN ENGINEERING | 1995年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
CATHEPSIN B; CYSTATIN C; CYSTEINE PROTEASE; PAPAYA PROTEINASE IV; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.1093/protein/8.1.53
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Cysteine proteases of the papain family generally exhibit broad P-1 specificity. A notable exception is papaya proteinase IV (PPIV), which only accepts Gly at this position. In all other cysteine proteases the S-1 subsite residues 23 and 65 (papain numbering) are absolutely conserved as Gly, while in PPIV they are replaced by Glu and Arg, respectively, These differences appear to underlie both PPIV specificity and its resistance to inhibition by cystatins, To test this hypothesis, the equivalent residues (Gly27 and Gly73) in the mammalian cysteine protease cathepsin B were changed to Glu and Arg, respectively, Relative to the wild-type enzyme, the Gly27Glu and Gly73Arg mutants showed a drastic reduction in activity with substrates containing a PI Arg, In contrast, substrates having a Gly residue in P-1 were hydrolyzed effectively, The double mutant (Gly27Glu:Gly73Arg) exhibited no detectable activity against any substrate studied, Inhibition of the Gly73Arg mutant by E-64 [1-(L-trans-epoxysuccinyl-L-leucylamino)-4-guanidinobutane] was found to be similar to that of the wild-type enzyme. In contrast, inhibition by cystatin C exhibited a 20 000-fold reduction. These results demonstrate the dramatic influence of side chains at sequence locations 27 and 73 on the S-1 subsite specificity of cysteine proteases.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 57
页数:5
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Abrahamson M., Ritonja A., Brown M.A., Grubb A., Machleidt W., Barrett J., J. Biol. Chem, 262, pp. 9688-9694, (1987)
[2]  
Abrahamson M., Mason R.W., Hansson H., Buttle D.J., Grubb A., Ohlsson K., Biochem. J., 273, pp. 621-626, (1991)
[3]  
Barrett A.J., Kirschke H., Methods Enzymol., 80, pp. 535-561, (1981)
[4]  
Bazan J.F., Fletterick R.J., Prcic. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, pp. 7872-7876, (1988)
[5]  
Berger A., Schechter I., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B257, pp. 249-264, (1970)
[6]  
Berti P.J., Faerman C.H., Storer A.C., Biochemistry, 30, pp. 1394-1402, (1991)
[7]  
Bode W., Engh R., Musil D., Thiele U., Huber R., Karshikov A., Brzin J., Kos J., Turk V., EMBO J., 7, pp. 2593-2599, (1988)
[8]  
Brocklehurst K., Willenbrock F., Salih E., Hydrolytic Enzymes, pp. 39-158, (1987)
[9]  
Brismme D., Bescherer K., Kirschke H., Fittkau S., Biochem. J, 245, pp. 381-385, (1987)
[10]  
Buttle D.J., Kembhavi A.A., Sharp S.L., Shute R.E., Rich D.H., Bartett A.J., Biochem. J., 261, pp. 469-476, (1989)