FREQUENCY-DEPENDENCE OF MR RELAXATION-TIMES .2. IRON-OXIDES

被引:101
作者
BULTE, JWM
VYMAZAL, J
BROOKS, RA
PIERPAOLI, C
FRANK, JA
机构
[1] Diagnostic Radiology Department, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, Rm 1C660
[2] Neuroimaging Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, Rm 1C660
关键词
CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIFFUSION IMAGING; IRON; MAGNETIC PARTICLE IMAGING; RELAXOMETRY;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.1880030414
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The frequency dependence of T1 and T2 was measured for homogeneous suspensions of magnetite and iron oxyhydroxide particles in water with various concentrations of gelatin. The transverse relaxivity showed two types of behavior: (a) For magnetite particles, there was a rapid increase in T2 relaxivity with frequency, followed by a saturation plateau, which accorded with the Langevin magnetization function. From these curves, the magnetic moment of the particle domains was estimated to range from 0.8 to 6.3 X 10(4) Bohr magnetons. (b) For iron oxyhydroxide (ferritin, ferrihydrite, and akaganeite) particles, T2 relaxivity increased linearly with frequency, the slope of the increase characteristic for each particle. T2 relaxivity generally increased with increasing gelatin concentration, corresponding to the measured decrease in the water diffusion coefficient. For iron oxides, homogeneously distributed either as iatrogenic agents or endogenous biominerals, these findings may aid in the interpretation of in vivo relaxivity and the effect on MR imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 648
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Weissleder R., Bogdanov A, Papisov M, Drug targeting in magnetic resonance imaging, Magn Reson Q, 8, pp. 55-63, (1992)
  • [2] Kent TA, Quast MJ, Kaplan BJ, Lifsey RS, Eisenberg HM, Assessment of a superparamagnetic iron oxide (AMI‐25) as a brain contrast agent, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 13, pp. 434-443, (1990)
  • [3] Wendland MF, White DL, Aicher KP, Tzika AA, Moseley ME, Detection with echo‐planar MR imaging of transit of susceptibility contrast medium in a rat model of regional brain ischemia, JMRI, 1, pp. 285-292, (1991)
  • [4] White DL, Aicher KP, Tzika A, Kucharczyk J, Engelstad BL, Moseley ME, Iron‐dextran as a magnetic susceptibility contrast agent: flow‐related contrast effects in the T2‐weighted spin‐echo MRI of normal rat and cat brain, Magn Reson Med, 24, pp. 14-28, (1992)
  • [5] Majumdar S, Gore JC, Studies of diffusion in random fields produced by variations in susceptibility, J Magn Reson, 78, pp. 41-55, (1988)
  • [6] Rozenman Y, Zou X, Kantor HL, Signal loss induced by superparamagnetic iron oxide particles in NMR spin‐echo images: the role of diffusion, Magn Reson Med, 14, pp. 31-39, (1990)
  • [7] Hardy P, Henkelman RM, On the transverse relaxation rate enhancement induced by diffusion of spins through inhomoge‐neous fields, Magn Reson Med, 17, pp. 348-356, (1991)
  • [8] Hardy P, Bronskill MJ, Belanger M-J, Henkelman RM, Use of magnetic particles for sensitizing MR images to blood flow, JMRI, 1, pp. 431-440, (1991)
  • [9] Zhong J, Gore JC, Studies of restricted diffusion in heterogeneous media containing variations in susceptibility, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 19, pp. 276-284, (1991)
  • [10] Bauer WR, Schulten K, Theory of contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging: coupling of spin relaxation and transport, Magn Reson Med, 26, pp. 16-39, (1992)