CAN READING DISABILITIES BE DIAGNOSED WITHOUT USING INTELLIGENCE-TESTS

被引:83
作者
AARON, PG
机构
[1] Department of Educational and School Psychology, Indiana State University
关键词
D O I
10.1177/002221949102400306
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Unlike conventional procedures, which use IQ in making diagnostic and eligibility decisions regarding learning disabilities, this demonstration study used listening comprehension and other reading-related tasks to make a differential diagnosis of reading disabilities. Tests of listening and reading comprehension were administered to 180 children from Grades 3 through 8. A regression equation was then derived to predict reading comprehension from listening comprehension. The regression equation was applied to the listening comprehension scores of seven children from Grades 3 to 8 who had reading difficulties, and their reading comprehension was predicted. Based on the discrepancy between their actual reading comprehension and the predicted reading comprehension, their reading difficulty was attributed to one of the following three factors: (a) poor decoding, (b) poor comprehension, or (c) a combination of poor decoding and poor comprehension. The validity of these diagnostic decisions was assessed by testing independently these children's word-decoding skill and reading speed. The results suggest that this diagnostic procedure has potential utility.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 186
页数:9
相关论文
共 68 条
[21]  
FIEDOROWICZ CA, 1983, THESIS MCGILL U MONT
[22]   LEARNING-DISABILITY DISCREPANCY FORMULAS - THEIR USE IN ACTUAL PRACTICE [J].
FORNESS, SR ;
SINCLAIR, E ;
GUTHRIE, D .
LEARNING DISABILITY QUARTERLY, 1983, 6 (02) :107-114
[23]  
Frith U., 1983, BRIT J DEV PSYCHOL, V1, P329, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.2044-835X.1983.TB00906.X, 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1983.tb00906.x]
[24]   LETS END THE READING DISABILITIES LEARNING-DISABILITIES DEBATE [J].
GASKINS, IW .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 1982, 15 (02) :81-83
[25]   LEARNING-DISABILITY VS READING-DISABILITY - A SURVEY OF PRACTITIONERS DIAGNOSTIC POPULATIONS AND TEST INSTRUMENTS [J].
GERMAN, D ;
JOHNSON, B ;
SCHNEIDER, M .
LEARNING DISABILITY QUARTERLY, 1985, 8 (02) :141-157
[26]  
Gough P.B., 1986, REM SPEC EDUC, V7, P6, DOI [10.1177/074193258600700104, DOI 10.1177/074193258600700104, https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104]
[27]   THE ENIGMA OF HYPERLEXIA [J].
HEALY, JM .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1982, 17 (03) :319-338
[28]   DECODING AS A COMPONENT OF READING-COMPREHENSION AMONG SECONDARY STUDENTS [J].
HOOD, J ;
DUBERT, LA .
JOURNAL OF READING BEHAVIOR, 1983, 15 (04) :51-61
[29]   WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE HIGH VERBAL [J].
HUNT, E ;
LUNNEBORG, C ;
LEWIS, J .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 7 (02) :194-227
[30]   PROCESSING DETERMINANTS OF READING SPEED [J].
JACKSON, MD ;
MCCLELLAND, JL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1979, 108 (02) :151-181