AMBIVALENCE OVER EMOTIONAL EXPRESSION AND WELL-BEING - NOMOTHETIC AND IDIOGRAPHIC TESTS OF THE STRESS-BUFFERING HYPOTHESIS
被引:57
作者:
KATZ, IM
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,DEPT PSYCHOL,2136 W MALL,VANCOUVER V6T 1Z4,BC,CANADAUNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,DEPT PSYCHOL,2136 W MALL,VANCOUVER V6T 1Z4,BC,CANADA
KATZ, IM
[1
]
CAMPBELL, JD
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,DEPT PSYCHOL,2136 W MALL,VANCOUVER V6T 1Z4,BC,CANADAUNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,DEPT PSYCHOL,2136 W MALL,VANCOUVER V6T 1Z4,BC,CANADA
CAMPBELL, JD
[1
]
机构:
[1] UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,DEPT PSYCHOL,2136 W MALL,VANCOUVER V6T 1Z4,BC,CANADA
Nomothetic and idiographic relations between ambivalence over emotional expression (AEQ; King & Emmons, 1990) and well-being were examined in a 4-month study with an interim 2-week diary component. Nomothetic and idiographic analyses both revealed that AEQ was related to psychological health but not to physical well-being. The nomothetic test of stress-buffering showed that AEQ was more predictive of depression among Ss who had experienced higher levels of positive life-event stress. In contrast, the idiographic test of stress-buffering revealed that Ss higher in AEQ exhibited less covariation between daily stress and negative affect over time. It is proposed that AEQ may reflect 2 types of emotional vulnerability-emotional reactivity and emotional perseveration-and the implications of this distinction for testing the stress-buffering hypothesis are discussed.