MEASUREMENT OF CELL-KINETICS IN CERVICAL TUMORS USING BROMODEOXYURIDINE

被引:19
作者
BOLGER, BS
COOKE, TG
SYMONDS, RP
MACLEAN, AB
STANTON, PD
机构
[1] UNIV GLASGOW,QUEEN MOTHERS HOSP,DEPT MIDWIFERY,GLASGOW G31 2ER,SCOTLAND
[2] UNIV GLASGOW,WESTERN INFIRM,DEPT ONCOL,GLASGOW G11 6NT,SCOTLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1993.307
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The pre-treatment cell kinetcis of 120 cervical tumours were assessed following the in vivo labelling with the thymidine analogue Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd). In 89% both static and temporal kinetic parameters could be measured. Through the analysis of multiple biopsies from each tumour marked intra tumour heterogeneity was demonstrated. The median values for the most highly labelled sample analysed for each tumour were; S-phase duration (Ts) 12.1 h, BrdUrd labelling index (CLI) 9.5% and potential tumour doubling time 4.4 days. There was a significant elevation in CLI, but no difference in Ts, between tumour and non-neoplastic cervical tissue. There was also a significant elevation in CLI in advanced stage and large size tumours. Although a significant elevation in CLI was found in aneuploid tumours this is likely to represent the systemic bias of the calculation methods, with no difference being seen between aneuploid and diploid tumours when BrdUrd labelling was measured with-out reference to the nuclei DNA content. The majority of these patients were treated with radiotherapy and cell kinetic data will be correlated with treatment response when adequate follow up has been achieved.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 171
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   A METHOD TO MEASURE THE DURATION OF DNA-SYNTHESIS AND THE POTENTIAL DOUBLING TIME FROM A SINGLE SAMPLE [J].
BEGG, AC ;
MCNALLY, NJ ;
SHRIEVE, DC ;
KARCHER, H .
CYTOMETRY, 1985, 6 (06) :620-626
[2]  
BEGG AC, 1992, SEMIN RADIAT ONCOL, V2, P22
[3]  
BENNINGT.JL, 1969, CANCER RES, V29, P1082
[4]   CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX UTERI - AN ASSESSMENT OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF TUMOR PROLIFERATION TO PROGNOSIS [J].
COLE, DJ ;
BROWN, DC ;
CROSSLEY, E ;
ALCOCK, CJ ;
GATTER, KC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 65 (05) :783-785
[5]   DNA PLOIDY, GRADE, AND STAGE IN PROGNOSIS OF UTERINE CERVICAL-CANCER [J].
DAVIS, JR ;
ARISTIZABAL, S ;
WAY, DL ;
WEINER, SA ;
HICKS, MJ ;
HAGAMAN, RM .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1989, 32 (01) :4-7
[6]   PRETREATMENT H-3-TDR LABELING OF CERVICAL BIOPSIES - HISTOLOGY, STAGING AND TUMOR RESPONSE TO RADIOTHERAPY [J].
DIXON, B ;
WARD, AJ ;
JOSLIN, CAF .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1977, 28 (05) :491-497
[7]  
DRESSLER LG, 1988, CANCER, V61, P420, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19880201)61:3<420::AID-CNCR2820610303>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-0
[9]   POTENTIAL FOR INCREASING THE DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE BETWEEN TUMORS AND NORMAL-TISSUES - CAN PROLIFERATION RATE BE USED [J].
FOWLER, JF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1986, 12 (04) :641-645
[10]   FLOW CYTOMETRIC QUANTITATION OF DNA AND C-MYC ONCOPROTEIN IN ARCHIVAL BIOPSIES OF UTERINE CERVIX NEOPLASIA [J].
HENDYIBBS, P ;
COX, H ;
EVAN, GI ;
WATSON, JV .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1987, 55 (03) :275-282