CHANGES IN PLANT-SPECIES RICHNESS IN A CALCAREOUS GRASSLAND FOLLOWING CHANGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL-CONDITIONS

被引:28
作者
HUBER, R
机构
[1] Department of Ecological Botany, Uppsala University, Uppsala, S-752 36
[2] Ecological Research Station, Färjestaden, S-386 93
来源
FOLIA GEOBOTANICA & PHYTOTAXONOMICA | 1994年 / 29卷 / 04期
关键词
ALVAR; COEXISTENCE; COMPETITION; GRAZING; DIVERSITY; LIGHT; NUTRIENTS; WATER AVAILABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/BF02883145
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
This study presents results of a three and a half year experiment in a calcareous grassland on the Baltic island of Oland, south-eastern Sweden. Environmental conditions, viz. nutrient regime, water availability, light conditions and grazing pressure were changed in a randomised experimental design with ten different combinations of these factors, including a control. Weather conditions during the study period fluctuated considerably. Only the combination of reduced light and increased soil nutrient availability decreased species richness significantly, presumably by inducing asymmetric competition for light by competitively strong species. Physical space also became less available for weaker competitors. In cases where only nutrients or only water were supplied in sufficient amounts, competitive exclusion was inhibited by either low nutrient or low water availability. Under conditions which combined high levels of nutrient and water supply with regular disturbance (i.e. simulated grazing) high species richness was maintained. Although there was a significant negative correlation between species richness and amount of above-ground biomass, the number of species was not significantly reduced in the treatment which combined fertilisation and irrigation. One reason for this may be that the heterogeneous light regime in this treatment still allowed species persistence and coexistence.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 482
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Al-Mufti M.M., Sydes C.L., Furness S.B., Grime J.P., Band S.R., A quantitative analysis of shoot phenology and dominance in herbaceous vegetation, The Journal of Ecology, 65, pp. 759-791, (1977)
[2]  
Beyschlag W., Ryel R.J., Ullmann I., Experimental and modelling studies of competition for light in roadside grasses, Bot. Acta, 105, pp. 285-291, (1992)
[3]  
Dodd J.L., Lauenroth W.K., Analysis of the response of a grassland ecosystem to stress, Perspectives in grassland ecology, pp. 43-58, (1979)
[4]  
Donald C.M., The interaction of competition for light and for nutrients, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 9, pp. 421-435, (1958)
[5]  
Gauch H.G., Multivariate analysis in community ecology, (1982)
[6]  
Glenn S.M., Collins S.L., Experimental analysis of patch dynamics in tallgrass prairie plant communities, J. Veg. Sci., 4, pp. 157-162, (1993)
[7]  
Grime J.P., Plant strategies and vegetation processes, (1979)
[8]  
Grubb P.J., The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: The importance of the regeneration niche, Biological Reviews, 52, pp. 107-145, (1977)
[9]  
Herben T., Krahulec F., Hadincova V., Skalova H., Small-scale spatial variability as a mechanism for large-scale stability in mountain grasslands, J. Veg. Sci., 4, pp. 163-170, (1993)
[10]  
Huston M., A general hypothesis of species diversity, The American Naturalist, 113, pp. 81-101, (1979)