CO-60 PLAQUE RADIOTHERAPY VS ENUCLEATION FOR POSTERIOR UVEAL MELANOMA

被引:59
作者
AUGSBURGER, JJ
GAMEL, JW
LAURITZEN, K
BRADY, LW
机构
[1] UNIV LOUISVILLE, HLTH SCI CTR, SCH MED, DEPT OPHTHALMOL & VISUAL SCI, LOUISVILLE, KY 40202 USA
[2] VET ADM MED CTR, LOUISVILLE, KY 40202 USA
[3] HAHNEMANN UNIV, COLL MED, DEPT RADIAT ONCOL & NUCL MED, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9394(14)70691-9
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
We compared the survival of 302 patients with a primary choroidal or ciliary body melanoma treated by cobalt-60 plaque radiotherapy between 1976 and 1982 with the survival of 134 patients treated by enucleation during the same period. Tumor size, location of the anterior margin of the tumor, and patient age at the time of treatment were identified as simultaneous significant clinical variables for predicting melanoma-specific mortality by multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. We computed a prognostic index for each patient based on this model and found that patients in the enucleation group had slightly higher values of this index than did patients in the cobalt-60 plaque radiotherapy group. Risk ratios for the treatment effect computed from a Cox model incorporating prognostic index and the treatment variable were found to be approximately equal to 1, both for analysis of melanoma-specific mortality and total mortality. These results indicate that when one controls for differences in prognostic index between the groups, cobalt-60 plaque therapy and enucleation are essentially equivalent in their effect on survival.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 592
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   COBALT PLAQUE VERSUS ENUCLEATION FOR UVEAL MELANOMA - COMPARISON OF SURVIVAL RATES [J].
ADAMS, KS ;
ABRAMSON, DH ;
ELLSWORTH, RM ;
HAIK, BG ;
BEDFORD, M ;
PACKER, S ;
SEDDON, J ;
ALBERT, D ;
POLIVOGIANIS, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1988, 72 (07) :494-497
[2]  
AUGSBURGER JJ, 1986, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V104, P655
[3]  
AUGSBURGER JJ, IN PRESS T AM OPHTHA
[4]  
CHEVALLIER B, 1988, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V62, P2517, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19881215)62:12<2517::AID-CNCR2820621211>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-9
[6]  
EARLE J, 1987, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V105, P763
[7]  
FEINSTEIN AR, 1985, ARCH CLIN RES, P44
[8]   IMPORTANCE OF BETA, TYPE-II ERROR AND SAMPLE-SIZE IN DESIGN AND INTERPRETATION OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL - SURVEY OF 71 NEGATIVE TRIALS [J].
FREIMAN, JA ;
CHALMERS, TC ;
SMITH, H ;
KUEBLER, RR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 299 (13) :690-694
[9]   NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS [J].
KAPLAN, EL ;
MEIER, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) :457-481
[10]  
Lee ET, 1980, STATISTICAL METHODS, P306