MANAGEMENT OF SWITCHGRASS FOR FORAGE AND SEED PRODUCTION

被引:20
作者
BREJDA, JJ
BROWN, JR
WYMAN, GW
SCHUMACHER, WK
机构
来源
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT | 1994年 / 47卷 / 01期
关键词
PANICUM-VIRGATUM L; WARM-SEASON GRASSES; NITROGEN FERTILIZATION; TILLERING; SEED QUALITY;
D O I
10.2307/4002835
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Management of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) for both forage and seed would improve the diversity of options livestock producers have for their stands. Our objective was to evaluate how timing of the forage harvest and N applications can be used to manage switchgrass for both forage and seed from the same stand. Switchgrass forage was harvested in late May (prior to stem elongation) or mid-June (early boot stage) or left uncut and treated with either a single application of 88 kg N ha-1 in the spring or 4-weeks after green-up, or split applications of 44 kg N ha-1 in the spring and 44 kg N ha-1 following defoliation. The late May harvest gave lower yields of higher quality forage whereas the mid-June harvest produced greater yields of lower quality forage. Both the late May and mid-June harvest increased total tiller density compared to uncut plots, but a mid-June harvest decreased reproductive tiller density. Application of N following defoliation increased both total tiller density and reproductive tiller density but the response was small with a mid-June harvest. A mid-June harvest reduced both seed yield and 100-seed weights all 3 years. A late May harvest reduced same-year seed yields and 100-seed weights in 1991 only, when the harvest was taken after stem elongation had initiated. Application of N following defoliation stimulated plant regrowth, enhancing same-year seed yield. Harvesting switchgrass for forage in the spring prior to stem elongation followed by a post-harvest N application of 44 kg N ha-1 allows producers to manage switchgrass for both forage and seed.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 27
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
AHRING RM, 1978, OKLA AGR EXP STN T T, V149
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, PRINCIPLES PROCEDURE
[3]   RESPONSE OF SWITCHGRASS (PANICUM-VIRGATUM L) TO CLIPPING FREQUENCY [J].
BEATY, ER ;
POWELL, JD .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1976, 29 (02) :132-135
[4]   ANALYSIS OF FORAGE RESEARCH SAMPLES UTILIZING A COMBINATION OF WET CHEMISTRY AND NEAR-INFRARED REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY [J].
BROWN, WF ;
MOORE, JE .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1987, 64 (01) :271-282
[5]  
BUCHHOLZ DD, 1986, SOIL TEST INTERPRETA
[6]   COMPARISON OF CELLULASE SOLUTIONS FOR USE IN DIGESTING FORAGE SAMPLES [J].
BUGHRARA, SS ;
SLEPER, DA ;
BEUSELINCK, PR .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1992, 84 (04) :631-636
[7]   DIGESTION OF SEVERAL TEMPERATE FORAGE SPECIES BY A PREPARED CELLULASE SOLUTION [J].
BUGHRARA, SS ;
SLEPER, DA .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1986, 78 (01) :94-98
[8]  
Clubine S., 1986, WARM SEASON GRASSES, P10
[9]  
CORNELIUS DR, 1950, ECOL MONOGR, V20, P3
[10]   SPRING DEFOLIATION TO IMPROVE SUMMER SUPPLY AND QUALITY OF SWITCHGRASS [J].
GEORGE, JR ;
OBERMANN, D .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1989, 81 (01) :47-52