SIGNIFICANCE OF ANTENATAL DETECTION AND THE CHOICE OF THE DELIVERY PLACE OF SEVERELY SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE FETUSES

被引:4
作者
PALO, P
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Central Hospital of Turku, Turku
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-999305
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The outcome of 72 severely small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses (birthweight below the 2.5 percentile) was compared with the outcome of 144 next-born average for gestational age (AGA) fetuses (birthweight between the loth and the 90th percentile). Both these groups were matched for gestational age, sex, and maternal parity. The purpose of SGA versus AGA comparison was to allow for discussion on the significance of prenatal diagnosis of severely SGA fetuses in planning an appropriate delivery setting. In this study, SGA fetuses were more often delivered abdominally because of suspected fetal distress; this was especially true of practically all the pre-term SGA fetuses. Severely SGA newborns had more acidosis and they more often needed neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) placement than their AGA counterparts. From these observations, it can be concluded that antenatal detection of severely SGA fetuses seems to be important. Delivery of the severely SGA fetus, moreover, should be scheduled in the hospital setting, where NICU facilities are readily available.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 138
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Tenovuo A.H., Kero P.O., Korvenranta H.J., Erkkola R.U., Klemi P.J., Tuominen J., Risk factors associated with severely small-for-gestational age neonates, Am J Perinatol, 5, pp. 267-271, (1988)
  • [2] Ott W.J., Doyle S., Ultrasonic diagnosis of altered fetal growth by use of a normal ultrasonic fetal weight curve, Obstet Gynecol, 63, pp. 201-204, (1984)
  • [3] Palo P., Erkkola R., Piiroinen O., Ruotsalainen P., Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation and detection of small for gestational age fetuses, Am J Perinatol, 6, pp. 400-404, (1989)
  • [4] Allen M.C., Developmental outcome and followup of the small for gestational age infant, Semin Perinatol, 8, pp. 123-156, (1984)
  • [5] Moilanen I., To be born as a twin—risks and sequelae, (1979)
  • [6] Bolle A., Schlensker K.H., Breuker K.H., Wolff F., Obstetric management of labor in severe fetal growth retardation, Diagnosis, labor and prognosis of the newborn. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 43, pp. 93-98, (1983)
  • [7] Krause W., Michels W., Wagner U., Retardation problems within the scope of prematurity, Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 45, pp. 854-858, (1985)
  • [8] Mandruzzato G.P., D Ottavio G., Rustico M.A., Alberico S., Bogatti P., Nesladek N., Management of intrauterine growth retardation: diagnostic and clinical aspects, Fetal Ther, 1, pp. 126-128, (1986)
  • [9] Poisson-Salomon A.S., Beart G., Intrauterine growth retardation, Changes in obstetrical practice in France. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 16, pp. 163-171, (1987)
  • [10] Wennergren M., Wennergren G., Vilbergsson G., Obstetric characteristics and neonatal performance in a four-year small for gestational age population, Obstet Gynecol, 72, pp. 615-620, (1988)