SOIL PRODUCTIVITY INDEX - PREDICTIONS OF SITE QUALITY FOR WHITE SPRUCE PLANTATIONS

被引:48
作者
GALE, MR
GRIGAL, DF
HARDING, RB
机构
[1] PROCTER & GAMBLE CELLULOSE CORP, PERRY, FL 32347 USA
[2] UNIV MINNESOTA, DEPT SOIL SCI & FOREST RESOURCES, ST PAUL, MN 55108 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500060033x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Very few site-quality models have incorporated the biological effects of multiple soil properties on optimum root growth. One such model that was originally developed for agronomic crops and has been used for naturally forested stands is the soil productivity index (PI) model. Our objectives for this study were to determine if the PI model could be used to estimate site quality for white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) plantations and to compare the use of PI vs. site index in equations describing changes in aboveground biomass with age. The PI model includes an estimate of optimum vertical root distributions that is used to weight the relative effects of mineral-soil characteristics (bulk density, pH, available water capacity, and aeration) on aboveground biomass. Relative topographic (percent slope) and climatic (precipitation and evaporation potential) information are also used in the model. Results indicated that site index and PI were not significantly correlated. However, PI was more highly correlated with aboveground stand biomass and mean annual biomass increment than was site index. Site index was more highly correlated with biomass estimates in older plantations (35-43 yr), whereas PI was more highly correlated to biomass estimates in younger plantations (19-34 yr). To further assess the relationships between estimates of biomass and site quality, adjusted for age, a Schumacher-type equation was used. Comparable results were observed between stand-biomass equations using PI vs. site index.
引用
收藏
页码:1701 / 1708
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Assmann E., 1970, PRINCIPLES FOREST YI
[2]  
BAKER JB, 1979, SO26 US FOR SERV US
[3]  
Blake GR, 1965, AGRONOMY, P374, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.1.C29
[4]  
BRIGGS RD, 1988, CFRU20 MAIN AGR EXP, P13
[5]  
Carmean W.H., 1975, ADV AGRON, P209, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)70011-7
[6]  
COILE TS, 1937, J FOREST, V35, P247
[7]  
CZARNOWSKI MS, 1964, BIOL SCI SER
[8]  
GALE MR, 1990, PROCESS MODELING OF FOREST GROWTH RESPONSES TO ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS, P303
[9]   VERTICAL ROOT DISTRIBUTIONS OF NORTHERN TREE SPECIES IN RELATION TO SUCCESSIONAL STATUS [J].
GALE, MR ;
GRIGAL, DF .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1987, 17 (08) :829-834
[10]  
GALE MR, 1988, 1987 P IUFRO FOR GRO, P403