RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN METHODOLOGICAL RIGOR AND REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ORGANIZATION-DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION RESEARCH

[1] Anderson S. B., 1975, ENCY ED EVALUATION

[2] [Anonymous], 1971, STAT PRINCIPLES EXPT

[3] Brickell H. M., 1976, EVALUATION COMMENT, V5, P1

[4] Kirk R, 2014, EXPT DESIGN PROCEDUR, DOI [10.4135/9781483384733, DOI 10.4135/9781483384733]

[5] EVALUATION METHODOLOGY IN ORGANIZATION-DEVELOPMENT - ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1978, 14 (02) : 151 - 173

[6] ROSENTHAL R, 1966, EXPT EFFECTS BEHAVIO

[7] TERPSTRA DE, UNPUBLISHED

[8] White S. E., 1976, ACAD MANAGE REV, P57

[1] Anderson S. B., 1975, ENCY ED EVALUATION

[2] [Anonymous], 1971, STAT PRINCIPLES EXPT

[3] Brickell H. M., 1976, EVALUATION COMMENT, V5, P1

[4] Kirk R, 2014, EXPT DESIGN PROCEDUR, DOI [10.4135/9781483384733, DOI 10.4135/9781483384733]

[5] EVALUATION METHODOLOGY IN ORGANIZATION-DEVELOPMENT - ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1978, 14 (02) : 151 - 173

[6] ROSENTHAL R, 1966, EXPT EFFECTS BEHAVIO

[7] TERPSTRA DE, UNPUBLISHED

[8] White S. E., 1976, ACAD MANAGE REV, P57