ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC QUANTITATION OF OPIOID EFFECT - COMPARATIVE PHARMACODYNAMICS OF FENTANYL AND SUFENTANIL

被引:242
作者
SCOTT, JC
COOKE, JE
STANSKI, DR
机构
[1] STANFORD UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT ANESTHESIA,STANFORD,CA 94305
[2] VET ADM MED CTR,DEPT ANESTHESIA,PALO ALTO,CA 94304
关键词
ANALGESICS; OPIOIDS; FENTANYL; SUFENTANIL; ANESTHETICS; INTRAVENOUS; MONITORING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PHARMACODYNAMICS; PHARMACOKINETICS;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199101000-00007
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The authors compared the pharmacodynamics of sufentanil with those of fentanyl using the electroencephalogram (EEG) as a measure of opioid drug effect. Sixteen patients were given a rapid infusion of sufentanil (18.75-mu-g/min) during EEG recording. To quantitate the opioid-induced slowing of the EEG, the authors analyzed its power spectrum and calculated the spectral edge. An inhibitory sigmoid E(max) model of the maximal decrease in spectral edge produced by the opioid related spectral edge values to serum concentrations of sufentanil. The resulting data for the pharmacodynamic parameters of sufentanil were compared with fentanyl parameters that were obtained by reanalysis from an identically conducted, previously published study. The half-time of blood-brain equilibration (T1/2Keo) was not statistically different between sufentanil and fentanyl (6.2 +/- 2.8 vs. 6.6 +/- 1.7 min, mean +/- SD, respectively). The intrinsic potency of sufentanil, as measured by the serum concentration needed to cause half the maximal EEG slowing (IC50), was 12-fold greater (0.68 +/- 0.31 ng/ml) than that of fentanyl (8.1 +/- 2.2 ng/ml). The second part of the study verified the hypothesis that administration of equipotent bolus doses would produce equal onset times. Bolus injections of either 125-mu-g of sufentanil or 1,250-mu-g of fentanyl were given during EEG recording. The time from injection to 50% maximal EEG slowing (T50) was calculated for each patient. The values for T50 for the two groups did not differ. The authors conclude that fentanyl and sufentanil have similar pharmacodynamic profiles, the former being 12 times more potent than the latter.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 42
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF SUFENTANIL IN SURGICAL PATIENTS
    BOVILL, JG
    SEBEL, PS
    BLACKBURN, CL
    OEILIM, V
    HEYKANTS, JJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1984, 61 (05) : 502 - 506
  • [2] ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC EFFECTS OF SUFENTANIL ANESTHESIA IN MAN
    BOVILL, JG
    SEBEL, PS
    WAUQUIER, A
    ROG, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1982, 54 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [3] INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH SMALL DOSES OF SUFENTANIL OR FENTANYL - DOSE VERSUS EEG RESPONSE, SPEED OF ONSET, AND THIOPENTAL REQUIREMENT
    BOWDLE, TA
    WARD, RJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1989, 70 (01) : 26 - 30
  • [4] CHAUVIN M, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V68, P1
  • [5] DECASTRO J, 1979, ACTA ANAESTH BELG, V30, P6
  • [6] COMPARISON OF SUFENTANIL-O-2 AND FENTANYL-O-2 FOR CORONARY-ARTERY SURGERY
    DELANGE, S
    BOSCOE, MJ
    STANLEY, TH
    PACE, N
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1982, 56 (02) : 112 - 118
  • [7] UNDERSTANDING THE DOSE-EFFECT RELATIONSHIP - CLINICAL-APPLICATION OF PHARMACOKINETIC-PHARMACODYNAMIC MODELS
    HOLFORD, NHG
    SHEINER, LB
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1981, 6 (06) : 429 - 453
  • [8] A MODEL FOR STUDYING DEPTH OF ANESTHESIA AND ACUTE TOLERANCE TO THIOPENTAL
    HUDSON, RJ
    STANSKI, DR
    SAIDMAN, LJ
    MEATHE, E
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1983, 59 (04) : 301 - 308
  • [9] HUDSON RJ, 1989, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V70, P425
  • [10] Klem G H, 1999, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl, V52, P3