EPICARDIAL ADMINISTRATION OF IBUTILIDE FROM POLYURETHANE MATRICES - EFFECTS ON DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC PARAMETERS

Polymer-drug composites known as controlled-release systems have been used effectively to prevent and treat ventricular arrhythmias in experimental studies. We wished to determine if such systems could be useful in reducing ventricular defibrillation energy requirements in an acute canine model without producing undesirable electrophysiologic effects. Ibutilide-polyurethane monolithic controlled-release matrices were formulated with ibutilide fumarate and a polyether polyurethane. In vitro drug-release characteristics of the drug matrices were determined. Two formulations were investigated: (a) 20% ibutilide by weight in polyether polyurethane, and (b) 4% ibutilide/16% dimethyl tartrate in polyurethane. Based on in vitro release studies, 20% ibutilide matrices (25 mg) would provide a 25-kg dog with a dose of 25 mu g/kg ibutilide in a 2-h acute experimental period, and 4% ibutilide matrices were estimated to provide 3.5 mu g/kg. We used each of these types of matrices in acute open-chest dog studies to assess electrophysiologic effects and the influence of epicardial controlled-release ibutilide, as compared with intravenous (i.v.) administration, on defibrillation energy thresholds (DFTs), using epicardial defibrillation electrodes. In monophasic defibrillation waveform studies, 20% matrices significantly decreased DFT as compared with a predrug control period [2.54 +/- 0.59 (mean +/- SEM) vs. 7.23 +/- 1.73 J, respectively, p = 0.038]. Administration of the same dose i.v. did not cause significant reduction in energy requirement. With a biphasic defibrillation waveform, 4% ibutilide matrices significantly decreased DFT as compared with control (2.53 +/- 0.34 vs. 3.42 +/- 0.46 J, respectively, p = 0.003). Administration of an equivalent i.v. dose did not cause a significant reduction in biphasic energy requirement. Both types of controlled-release systems significantly prolonged refractoriness and conduction times of ventricular extrastimuli as compared with vehicle. No proarrhythmia events were observed. Epicardial polymeric controlled-release ibutilide significantly prolonged ventricular refractoriness and conduction and thus may enhance antiarrhythmia activity. In addition, controlled-release ibutilide formulations significantly decreased DFT requirements. Thus, ibutilide-polymeric controlled-release matrix systems may be useful in conjunction with implantable defibrillators in preventing ventricular arrhythmias and reducing defibrillation energy requirements.