DECISION RULES AND SIGNAL DETECTABILITY IN A REINFORCEMENT-DENSITY DISCRIMINATION

Two probabilistic schedules of reinforcement, one richer in reinforcement, the other leaner, were overlapping stimuli to be discriminated in a choice situation. One of two schedules was in effect for 12 seconds. Then, during a 6‐second choice period, the first left‐key peck was reinforced if the richer schedule had been in effect, and the first right‐key peck was reinforced if the leaner schedule had been in effect. The two schedule stimuli may be viewed as two binomial distributions of the number of reinforcement opportunities. Each schedule yielded different frequencies of 16 substimuli. Each substimulus had a particular type of outcome pattern for the 12 seconds during which a schedule was in effect, and consisted of four consecutive light‐cued 3‐second T‐cycles, each having 0 or 1 reinforced center‐key pecks. Substimuli therefore contained 0 to 4 reinforcers. On any 3‐second cycle, the first center‐key peck darkened that key and was reinforced with probability .75 or .25 in the richer or leaner schedules, respectively. In terms of the theory of signal detection, detectability neared the maximum possible d′ for all four pigeons. Left‐key peck probability increased when number of reinforcers in a substimulus increased, when these occurred closer to choice, or when pellets were larger for correct left‐key pecks than for correct right‐key pecks. Averaged over different temporal patterns of reinforcement in a substimulus, substimuli with the same number of reinforcers produced choice probabilities that matched relative expected payoff rather than maximized one alternative. 1979 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior