A CRITIQUE OF VANFRAASSEN VOLUNTARISTIC EPISTEMOLOGY

被引:12
作者
KVANVIG, JL
机构
[1] Department of Philosophy, Texas A and M University, College Station, 77843-4237, TX
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF01063946
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Van Fraassen's epistemology is forged from two commitments, one to a type of Bayesianism and the other to what he terms voluntarism. Van Fraassen holds that if one is going to follow a rule in belief-revision, it must be a Bayesian rule, but that one does not need to follow a rule in order to be rational. It is argued that van Fraassen's arguments for rejecting non-Bayesian rules is unsound, and that his voluntarism is subject to a fatal dilemma arising from the non-monotonic character of reasoning.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 348
页数:24
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   CLEVER BOOKIES AND COHERENT BELIEFS [J].
CHRISTENSEN, D .
PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1991, 100 (02) :229-247
[2]  
Foley R., 1992, WORKING NET ESSAYS E
[3]  
FOLEY R, 1986, THEORY EPISTEMIC RAT
[4]  
JEFFREY R, 1984, SCI THEORIES MINNESO, V10, P133
[5]  
van Fraassen B. C., 1989, LAWS SYMMETRY