INSENSITIVITY OF THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TO HEREDITY-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION

被引:249
作者
WAHLSTEN, D
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton
关键词
causal models; gene action; heritability; nature/nurture; power; sample size; scale transformation;
D O I
10.1017/S0140525X00077797
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It makes sense to attribute a definite percentage of variation in some measure of behavior to variation in heredity only if the effects of heredity and environment are truly additive. Additivity is often tested by examining the interaction effect in a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or its equivalent multiple regression model. If this effect is not statistically significant at the α = 0.05 level, it is common practice in certain fields (e.g., human behavior genetics) to conclude that the two factors really are additive and then to use linear models, which assume additivity. Comparing several simple models of nonadditive, interactive relationships between heredity and environment, however, reveals that ANOVA often fails to detect nonadditivity because it has much less power in tests of interaction than in tests of main effects. Likewise, the sample sizes needed to detect real interactions are substantially greater than those needed to detect main effects. Data transformations that reduce interaction effects also change drastically the properties ofthe causal model and may conceal theoretically interesting and practically useful relationships. If the goal ofpartitioning variance among mutually exclusive causes and calculating “heritability” coefficients is abandoned, interactive relationships can be examined more seriously and can enhance our understanding of the ways living things develop. © 1990, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / &
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1971, STAT PRINCIPLES EXPT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1949, FACTORS OF EVOLUTION
[3]  
Atkinson B, 1985, CHANGES EUKARYOTIC G
[5]   A DROSOPHILA GENE IS SUBJECT TO GLUCOSE REPRESSION [J].
BENKEL, BF ;
HICKEY, DA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1987, 84 (05) :1337-1339
[6]   PLASTICITY OF THE DIFFERENTIATED STATE [J].
BLAU, HM ;
PAVLATH, GK ;
HARDEMAN, EC ;
CHIU, CP ;
SILBERSTEIN, L ;
WEBSTER, SG ;
MILLER, SC ;
WEBSTER, C .
SCIENCE, 1985, 230 (4727) :758-766
[7]   WHY YOU SHOULD AVOID STATISTICS [J].
BOLLES, RC .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1988, 23 (01) :79-85
[8]   SITUATIONISM IN PSYCHOLOGY - ANALYSIS AND A CRITIQUE [J].
BOWERS, KS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1973, 80 (05) :307-336
[9]   AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
BOX, GEP ;
COX, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1964, 26 (02) :211-252
[10]   MATERNAL CONTROL OF DROSOPHILA SEGMENTATION GENE-EXPRESSION [J].
CARROLL, SB ;
WINSLOW, GM ;
SCHUPBACH, T ;
SCOTT, MP .
NATURE, 1986, 323 (6085) :278-280