SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATION OF ACOUSTIC BACKSCATTER IN THE STRESS EXPERIMENT

Acoustic backscatter measurements were made of the seabed with a bottom mounted, circularly scanning sonar. The placement was at 91 m depth, mid-shelf of Northern California (38-degrees 34'N), site C3 of the experiment STRESS 1 (1988-1989). Our expectation was that sonar images (70 m radius, 12,000 m2) would provide a means of observing, over a large field of view, changes in the bottom due to storm-induced sediment transport and due to bioturbation. This expectation was supported in part by towed sonar measurements at 35 kHz over a sandy area in the North Sea, where dramatic spatial variation in the level of the backscattered signal was observed during an Autumn storm on scales of a few km with no concomitant change in sediment grain size [JACKSON et al. (1986) The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 1188-1199]. It appeared possible that storm-driven sediment transport might have been responsible for this patchiness, by altering bottom roughness and by redeposition of suspended material. At the California site, a conventional sonar processing of our data from the STRESS experiment reveals no such dramatic change in backscattered signal level due to storms. The sonar images contain random structures whose time evolution is subtle and difficult to interpret. A much clearer picture of temporal and spatial variations emerges from a processing scheme involving cross-correlation of time-separated acoustic views of the bottom. In effect, the sequence of correlation data images produces a movie in which patches of activity are seen to develop as functions of time. It appears that most of this activity is biological rather than hydrodynamic. A tentative explanation is two-fold. The bottom shear stress might have been considerably greater at the North Sea site (with depth only one-half of the California site). The seafloor at the California site was silty-clayey, and backscatter from such floor is less sensitive to the water-floor interface shape and roughness than it would be to the same parameters of a sandy bottom.