BARBITONE-INDUCED TOLERANCE TO THE EFFECTS OF SEDATIVE-HYPNOTICS AND RELATED COMPOUNDS ON OPERANT-BEHAVIOR IN THE RAT

被引:5
作者
CARNEY, JM
ROSECRANS, JA
VASKO, MR
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT NEUROL & PHARMACOL,DALLAS,TX 75235
[2] MED COLL VIRGINIA,DEPT PHARMACOL,RICHMOND,VA 23298
[3] VET ADM HOSP,DALLAS,TX 75216
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1476-5381.1979.tb07817.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Pretreatment doses of barbitone, pentobarbitone, ethanol, and phenytoin (diphenylhydantoin) in non‐tolerant rats produced increases in operant responding at low doses and at higher doses resulted in decreases in responding. Daily barbitone injections (100 mg/kg, i.p.) resulted in the development of functional tolerance to both the stimulant and depressant effects of barbitone on responding. Barbitone tolerance development did not result in any change in the brain or plasma pharmacokinetics of barbitone. Barbitone‐tolerant rats were cross‐tolerant to the behavioural effects of pentobarbitone, ethanol, and phenytoin. The dose‐effect curves for all of these drugs were shifted to the right in tolerant rats, compared to non‐tolerant rats. Comparison of the brain and plasma levels of these drugs in non‐tolerant and tolerant rats provided a means of separating functional cross‐tolerance from dispositional cross‐tolerance. Barbitone‐tolerant rats appeared to be functionally cross‐tolerant to ethanol in that there was no change in the brain and blood ethanol levels at times when the degree of behavioural impairment was substantially reduced. In contrast to ethanol, cross‐tolerance to phenytoin appeared to be due to a decrease in the brain and plasma levels (dispositional tolerance). Cross‐tolerance to pentobarbitone appeared to be comprised of both functional and dispositional cross‐tolerance. The usefulness of a multidisciplinary approach in the analysis of sedative hypnotic tolerance and cross‐tolerance is discussed. It is concluded that without the concurrent determination of both brain and plasma drug levels it would not be possible to distinguish between functional and dispositional tolerance. 1979 British Pharmacological Society
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 192
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
BARRETT JE, 1976, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V196, P605
[2]  
BLACK MB, 1970, PHARMACOLOGIST, V12, P258
[3]  
BURNS JJ, 1957, J BIOL CHEM, V277, P785
[4]   FACTORS INFLUENCING DRUG METABOLISM [J].
CONNEY, AH ;
BURNS, JJ .
ADVANCES IN PHARMACOLOGY, 1962, 1 :31-58
[5]   OFFSET OF MORPHINE-TOLERANCE IN RATS AND MICE [J].
COX, BM ;
GINSBURG, M ;
WILLIS, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1975, 53 (03) :383-391
[6]   EFFECTS OF D-AMPHETAMINE, SCOPOLAMINE, CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE AND DIPHENYLHYDANTOIN ON SELF-STIMULATION BEHAVIOR AND BRAIN ACETYLCHOLINE [J].
DOMINO, EF ;
OLDS, ME .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA, 1972, 23 (01) :1-&
[7]  
DORFMAN A, 1974, J PHARMAC EXP THER, V90, P330
[8]   DISTRIBUTION + METABOLISM OF BARBITAL-14C IN TOLERANT + NONTOLERANT RATS [J].
EBERT, AG ;
MIYA, TS ;
YIM, GKW .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1964, 13 (09) :1267-&
[9]   DEVELOPMENT OF BEHAVIORAL TOLERANCE TO MORPHINE AND METHADONE USING SCHEDULE-CONTROLLED BEHAVIOR OF PIGEON [J].
HEIFETZ, SA ;
MCMILLAN, DE .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA, 1971, 19 (01) :40-&
[10]  
KALANT H, 1971, PHARMACOL REV, V23, P135