LOG-LINEAR MODELING OF PAIRWISE INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT ON A CATEGORICAL SCALE

被引:29
作者
BECKER, MP [1 ]
AGRESTI, A [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV FLORIDA,DEPT STAT,GAINESVILLE,FL 32611
关键词
D O I
10.1002/sim.4780110109
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This article uses log-linear models to describe pairwise agreement among several raters who classify a sample on a subjective categorical scale. The models describe agreement structure simultaneously for second-order marginal tables of a multidimensional cross-classification of ratings. Practical difficulties arise in fitting the models, because models refer to pairwise marginal tables of a very large and sparse table. A standard analysis that treats the marginal tables as independent yields consistent estimates of model parameters, but not of the covariance matrix of the estimates. We estimate the covariance matrix using the jackknife. We apply the models to describe agreement between evaluations made by seven pathologists of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix, using a five-level ordinal scale. Previous analyses showed differences among the pathologists in their pairwise levels of agreement, but we observe near homogeneity in the dependence structure of their ratings.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 114
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   A MODEL FOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN RATINGS ON AN ORDINAL SCALE [J].
AGRESTI, A .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (02) :539-548
[2]  
Agresti A., 1990, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA
[3]  
AGRESTI A, 1992, UNPUB COMPUTATIONAL
[4]   MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF PARAMETERS SUBJECT TO RESTRAINTS [J].
AITCHISON, J ;
SILVEY, SD .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1958, 29 (03) :813-828
[5]   ON THE BIVARIATE NORMAL-DISTRIBUTION AND ASSOCIATION MODELS FOR ORDINAL CATEGORICAL-DATA [J].
BECKER, MP .
STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 1989, 8 (05) :435-440
[6]   USING ASSOCIATION MODELS TO ANALYZE AGREEMENT DATA - 2 EXAMPLES [J].
BECKER, MP .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1989, 8 (10) :1199-1207
[7]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[8]  
COX MAA, 1982, UTILITAS MATH A, V21, P29
[9]  
Darroch J.N., 1986, AUSTR J STATIST, V28, P371
[10]  
FLEISS JL, 1971, PSYCHOL BULL, V76, P378, DOI 10.1037/h0031619