ADJUSTMENTS OF SUFFICIENCY RANGES OF SELECTED ORNAMENTALS AND TURFGRASSES FOR ASSESSING NITROGEN WITH DUMAS-N DATA

被引:6
作者
SIMONNE, EH
MCCRIMMON, JN
SCOGGINSMANTERO, HL
MILLS, HA
CRESMAN, CP
机构
[1] NEW MEXICO STATE UNIV,DEPT AGRON & HORT,LAS CRUCES,NM 88003
[2] UNIV GEORGIA,DEPT HORT,ATHENS,GA 30602
[3] MICRO MACRO INT INC,ATHENS,GA 30607
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00103629509369443
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
With recent advances in nitrogen (N) analyzers, the Dumas method may replace the Kjeldahl method for the routine diagnosis of N in plants. Since these two methods recover different N fractions and no conversion factor is available to convert Dumas N (Dn) to Kjeldahl N (Kn) data, Kn:Dn ratios were determined for selected ornamentals (anthurium, Anthurium andraeanum Linden; orchid spp. Cattleya, Dendrobium, Oncidium, Phalaenopsis, and Vanda; leatherleaf fern, Rumohra adiantiformis (G. Forst) Ching; tree fern, Asparagus densiflorus (kunth) Jessop) and turfgrasses (creeping bentgrass, Agrostis palustris Huds. cv. Penncross; bermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon L.). Samples were dried at 70 degrees C for 72 hr and ground to pass a 20-mesh sieve. Kn was determined by colorimetry after digestion of 0.4 g of tissue using a CuSO4/TiO/K2SO4 catalyst and 10 mL of H2SO4 at 450 degrees C for 2 hr. Dn was determined using 0.2 g of sample and a LECO FP-428 N Analyzer. Over the 0.4-6.6% N range, Dn was a good predictor of Kn; Kn = 0.90 Dn + 0.09 (R(2)=0.93, p-model<0.01, n=397 obs.). The Kn:Dn ratio was significantly (p<0.01) affected by plant type (Kn:Dn = 0.85, 0.92, 0.99, and 1.00 for anthurium, turfgrasses, orchid and fern, respectively). The more practical way to use the ratios in routine interpretation was to adjust existing sufficiency ranges with the inverse of these ratios. Adjusted sufficiency ranges (in %N) were 4.9-6.6 for creeping bentgrass, 2.4-4.4 for bermudagrass, and 1.9-3.6 for anthurium. Existing sufficiency ranges for orchid and fern need not be adjusted for Dumas N.
引用
收藏
页码:2243 / 2251
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BARKER AV, 1974, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V99, P132
[2]   A SIMPLE METHOD FOR THE QUANTITATIVE RECOVERY OF NITRATE-N DURING KJELDAHL ANALYSIS OF DRY SOIL AND PLANT-SAMPLES [J].
DUPREEZ, DR ;
BATE, GC .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1989, 20 (3-4) :345-357
[3]   DETERMINATION OF NITROGEN AS ELEMENTARY-N, AN ALTERNATIVE TO KJELDAHL [J].
HANSEN, B .
ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA, 1989, 39 (02) :113-118
[4]  
Jones J. B. J., 1991, PLANT ANAL HDB PRACT
[5]  
Jones J. B. Jr., 1990, Soil testing and plant analysis., P389
[6]  
Jones J.J.B., 1991, KJELDAHL METHOD NITR
[7]  
LORENZ OA, 1978, NITROGEN ENV, V2, P201
[8]   AUTOMATED INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS OF CARBON AND NITROGEN IN PLANT AND SOIL SAMPLES [J].
MCGEEHAN, SL ;
NAYLOR, DV .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1988, 19 (04) :493-505
[9]  
NELSON DW, 1980, J ASSOC OFF ANA CHEM, V63, P770
[10]   A COMPARISON OF DRY COMBUSTION AND ACID DIGESTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF NITROGEN IN SOIL AND PLANT-MATERIAL [J].
OXENHAM, DJ ;
CATCHPOOLE, VR ;
DOLBY, GR .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1983, 14 (02) :153-160