COMPARATIVE ACTIVITY OF 3 REPELLENTS AGAINST THE TICKS RHIPICEPHALUS-SANGUINEUS AND ARGAS-PERSICUS

被引：27

作者：

KUMAR, S ^{[1
]}

PRAKASH, S ^{[1
]}

KAUSHIK, MP ^{[1
]}

RAO, KM ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] DEF RES & DEV ESTAB,GWALIOR 474002,INDIA

来源：

MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY | 1992年 / 6卷 / 01期

关键词：

RHIPICEPHALUS-SANGUINEUS; ARGAS-PERSICUS; REPELLENTS; DEPA; DEET AND DMP;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1365-2915.1992.tb00034.x

中图分类号：

Q96 [昆虫学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

The residual repellent activity of N,N-diethylphenyl-acetamide (DEPA), N,N-diethyl-3-methyl benzamide (DEET) and dimethylphthalate (DMP) against the hard tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille) and the soft tick Argas persicus (Oken) from topical application on rabbits and hens respectively in the laboratory have been studied. It was found that a 25% concentration of DEET gave strong repellency (> 90%) against larvae and nymphs of R. sanguineus for 15 and 7 days respectively and against A. persicus larvae and nymphs > 90% for 11 and 5 days respectively. Strong repellency (> 90%) against adults of the hard and soft ticks was observed for 9 and 7 days respectively with 40% DEET. DEPA at 25% concentration showed strong repellency (> 90%) against larvae and nymphs of R. sanguineus and A. persicus for 11 and 5 days respectively. Adults of hard and soft ticks were strongly repelled (> 90%) for 9 and 5 days respectively by 40% DEPA. DMP was found to be the least effective against all stages of both species of tick.

引用

页码：47 / 50

页数：4

共 15 条

[1]

Bar-Zeev M., Gothiff S., Laboratory evaluation of tick repellents, Journal of Medical Entomology, 10, (1973)

[2]

Bar-Zeev M., Gothiff S., Field evaluation of repellents against the tick Ornithodors tholozani Labon and Megn, Journal of Medical Entomology, 11, (1974)

[3]

Kalyanasundaram M., Amalraj D., Paily K.P., George N., Sujatha C.H., Synthesis of substituted amides for repellency against mosquitoes, Current Science, 55, (1986)

[4]

Kulkarni S.M., Laboratory cvaluation of somc repellents against larvac of trombuculid mites, Journal of Medical Etitomology, 14, (1977)

[5]

Kulkarni S.M., Naik V.M., Laboratory evaluation of six repellents against some Indian ticks, Indian Journal of Medical Research, 82, (1985)

[6]

Kumar S., Prakash S., Sharma R.K., Jain S.K., Kalyanasundaram M., Swamy R.V., Rao K.M., Field evaluation of thrcc rcpcllcnts against mosquitoes, black flies and land leeches, Indian Journal of Medical Research, 80, (1984)

[7]

Mathur K.K., Gupta G.P., Kaushik M.P., Sikder A.K., Laboratory cvaluation of DEPA and other insect repellents against rat flee Xenopsylla cheopis (Rothschild), Indian Journal of Medical Research, 63, (1987)

[8]

Paul C.F., Mishra B.P., Improved technique for rearing, 6 B, (1968)

[9]

Rao S.S., Prakash S., Kumar S., Kaveeshwar U., Bhattacharya B.K., Jaiswal D.K., Rao K.M., Toxicologic studies of an insect repellent N, N‐diethylphenylacctamide, Indian Journal of Medical Research, 85, (1987)

[10]

Rao S.S., Rao K.M., Ramachandran P.K., Chemistry efficacy and toxicology of insect repellents, Journal of Scientific and Industrial Reaearch, 41, (1988)

← 1 2 →