REPORTS OF MY DEATH ARE GREATLY EXAGGERATED - A REPLY

[1] AMAR, 1990, U PENN LAW REV, V138, P1499

[2] AMAR, 1989, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V56, P480

[3] AMAR, 1987, YALE LAW J, V96, P1440

[4] AMAR AR, 1985, BOSTON U LAW REV, V65, P205

[5] MARBURY, SECTION-13, AND THE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME-COURT [J]. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 1989, 56 (02) : 443 - 499

[6] BATOR, 1982, VILL L REV, V27, P1030

[7] BATOR, 1982, VILL L REV, V27, P1038

[8] A MANDATORY VIEW OF FEDERAL-COURT JURISDICTION - A GUIDED QUEST FOR THE ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING OF ARTICLE-III [J]. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1984, 132 (04) : 741 - 866

[9] ELLIOT J, 1888, SEVERAL STATE CONVEN, V1, P336

[10] FARRAND M, 1937, 1787 FED CONV, V2, P46

[1] AMAR, 1990, U PENN LAW REV, V138, P1499

[2] AMAR, 1989, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V56, P480

[3] AMAR, 1987, YALE LAW J, V96, P1440

[4] AMAR AR, 1985, BOSTON U LAW REV, V65, P205

[5] MARBURY, SECTION-13, AND THE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME-COURT [J]. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 1989, 56 (02) : 443 - 499

[6] BATOR, 1982, VILL L REV, V27, P1030

[7] BATOR, 1982, VILL L REV, V27, P1038

[8] A MANDATORY VIEW OF FEDERAL-COURT JURISDICTION - A GUIDED QUEST FOR THE ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING OF ARTICLE-III [J]. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1984, 132 (04) : 741 - 866

[9] ELLIOT J, 1888, SEVERAL STATE CONVEN, V1, P336

[10] FARRAND M, 1937, 1787 FED CONV, V2, P46