A COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL-METHODS FOR SOLVING THE ADVECTION EQUATION-III

被引:50
作者
CHOCK, DP
机构
[1] Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI 48121
来源
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS | 1991年 / 25卷 / 5-6期
关键词
ADVECTION EQUATION; NUMERICAL ERRORS;
D O I
10.1016/0960-1686(91)90128-T
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As a sequel to the previous studies (Atmospheric Environment 17, 11-24, 1983; Atmospheric Environment 19, 571-586, 1985), four algorithms and their variations for solving the advection equation were compared in terms of their accuracy, speed and storage requirements. The algorithms are the Smolarkiewicz methods, the higher-degree-weighting Petrov-Galerkin method, the Taylor-Galerkin method and the accurate-space-derivative method. The test problem was the rotation of a cosine-shaped hill of concentration in a two-dimensional circular velocity field at three or four different time increments. The Smolarkiewicz methods were found to be highly diffusive. The higher-degree-weighting Petrov-Galerkin method is comparable to, in accuracy and storage, but more time consuming than the chapeau-function method coupled with the Crank-Nicolson scheme. The forward-Euler Taylor-Galerkin method is even superior to the forward Euler chapeau-function method with balancing diffusion-a method recommended previously, because it has a greater range of applicable Courant number. The accurate-space-derivative method is extremely accurate but time consuming. A simple approach to remove the requirement for periodic boundary conditions was proposed which should enhance the attractiveness of the method for air quality modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 871
页数:19
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   FLUX-CORRECTED TRANSPORT .3. MINIMAL-ERROR FCT ALGORITHMS [J].
BORIS, JP ;
BOOK, DL .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1976, 20 (04) :397-431
[2]   A COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL-METHODS FOR SOLVING THE ADVECTION EQUATION [J].
CHOCK, DP ;
DUNKER, AM .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1983, 17 (01) :11-24
[3]   A COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL-METHODS FOR SOLVING THE ADVECTION EQUATION .2. [J].
CHOCK, DP .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1985, 19 (04) :571-586
[4]  
CHRISTENSEN O, 1976, J APPL METEOROL, V15, P1284, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1976)015<1284:APMFDO>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[7]   AN ANALYSIS OF TIME DISCRETIZATION IN THE FINITE-ELEMENT SOLUTION OF HYPERBOLIC PROBLEMS [J].
DONEA, J ;
QUARTAPELLE, L ;
SELMIN, V .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1987, 70 (02) :463-499
[8]   HIGHER-ORDER MONOTONIC CONVECTIVE DIFFERENCE SCHEMES [J].
FORESTER, CK .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1977, 23 (01) :1-22
[10]   COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL TECHNIQUES FOR USE IN AIR-POLLUTION MODELS WITH NON-LINEAR CHEMICAL-REACTIONS [J].
HOV, O ;
ZLATEV, Z ;
BERKOWICZ, R ;
ELIASSEN, A ;
PRAHM, LP .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1989, 23 (05) :967-983