REVIEW OF THE SECTION-309 COASTAL STATES ENHANCEMENT GRANTS PROGRAM

被引：10

作者：

BERNDCOHEN, T

POGUE, PM

LEE, V

DELANEY, RF

机构：

[1] Coastal Planning Consultant, Helena, MT

[2] Coastal Resources Center, Sea Grant Advisory Services, Graduate School of Oceanography,University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI

[3] Urban Harbors Institute, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA

来源：

COASTAL MANAGEMENT | 1995年 / 23卷 / 03期

关键词：

COASTAL MANAGEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; NATIONAL GOALS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STATE PROGRAMS;

D O I：

10.1080/08920759509362265

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

The Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (CZMA) was substantially amended by Congress in 1990 to create a new program. The Coastal Zone Enhancement Grants Program (Section 309) encourages stares to improve their coastal zone management (CZM) programs in eight national enhancement areas. A review of the 309 Enhancement Grants Program between 1992 and 1994 indicates that the overall intent of the program is being actively pursued by all coastal states with some notable achievements. The 309 program is serving as a catalyst for states to address issues beyond their existing programs and regulations. States are paying more attention to national issues, especially cumulative and secondary impacts of coastal development. States are strengthening their CZM programs through enactment of specific measurable changes such as new legislation, revised regulations, and adoption of local plans. The program's strength comes from its ability to lever age 309 to targeted needs. It is too soon to determine the unique contribution of the 309 program, because it is taking longer than anticipated for most states to achieve program changes. Only minor modifications should be made to the 309 program, to give states time to achieve program changes and to document on-the-ground and in-the-water results.

引用

页码：173 / 194

页数：22

共 69 条

[1]

Adams M.B., McCreary S.T., Institutional arrangements of state coastal management programs—some strengths and weaknesses, Coastal Zone ‘89, 2, pp. 2558-2572, (1989)

[2]

Archer J.H., Knecht R.W., The U.S. National coastal zone management program— problems and opportunities in the next phase, Coastal Management, 15, pp. 103-120, (1987)

[3]

Bemd-Cohen T., Delaney R., Refocusing how state coastal programs are evaluated, Coastal Society Fourteenth International Conference Proceedings, pp. 17-20, (1994)

[4]

Blair C., Rosenberg E.L., Virginia’s CZM program, Coastal Zone '87, 3, pp. 2983-2998, (1987)

[5]

Bom S.M., Miller A.H., Assessing networked coastal zone management programs, Coastal Management, 16, pp. 229-243, (1988)

[6]

Bowen R.E., Hoole F.W., Anderson S.H., Evaluating the impacts of coastal zone activities: An illustration of the evaluation research approach, Coastal Zone Management Journal, 7, pp. 25-46, (1980)

[7]

Brower D.J., Coates D.C., Godschalk D.R., Lugar M.I., Owens D.W., Armingeon N., Conway M.A., Grossman N., Henderson W.A., Mackie C.D., Sun D., Valuing coastal zone Management, (1990)

[8]

Brower D.J., Archer J.H., Coates D.C., Godschalk D.R., Lugar M.I., Owens D.W., Armingeon N., Grossman N., Henderson B., Schwab A.K., Evaluation of the National Coastal Zone Management Program, (1991)

[9]

Burgess J.P., Status of the coastal program: A federal perspective, Coastal Zone '89, 2, pp. 2529-2535, (1989)

[10]

Valuing Coastal Zone Management, (1990)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →