COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF HIERARCHICAL CLUSTER TECHNIQUES APPLIED TO AUTOMATED ELECTRON-PROBE X-RAY-MICROANALYSIS DATA

被引:22
作者
BERNARD, PC [1 ]
VANGRIEKEN, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV INSTELLING ANTWERP, DEPT CHEM, B-2610 WILRIJK, BELGIUM
关键词
ELECTRON PROBE METHODS; X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HIERARCHICAL CLUSTER TECHNIQUES; KAPPA STATISTICS; MINERALS;
D O I
10.1016/0003-2670(92)85009-U
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
For the processing of the large amount of data generated by automated electron probe x-ray microanalysis (EPXMA) of particulate samples, hierarchical cluster analysis are invoked. To evaluate the performance of seven hierarchical cluster techniques, cluster analyses were performed on a number of known mineral mixtures and the degree of correct classification was measured quantitatively by kappa statistics. In addition to the evaluation of the different cluster techniques, the influence on the cluster result of a number of experimental parameters was determined. In practice, ten mineral combinations were studied as a function of the mineral mixture ratio, using both normalized and unnormalized variables. For this purpose a total of 7000 cluster and kappa analyses were performed. In general, it seemed that Ward's method was most successful in finding the correct classification. For one mineral mixture, 2100 results were studied to elucidate the effect of the mixture size, of working with correlated/ uncorrelated variables (principal component space) and of the quantification of the EPXMA data (different deconvolution techniques applied to quantitative data obtained by the Armstrong-Buseck ZAF corrections).
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 93
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   QUANTITATIVE CHEMICAL-ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL MICROPARTICLES USING ELECTRON-MICROPROBE - THEORETICAL [J].
ARMSTRONG, JT ;
BUSECK, PR .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1975, 47 (13) :2178-2192
[2]   CLASSIFICATION OF ESTUARINE PARTICLES USING AUTOMATED ELECTRON-MICROPROBE ANALYSIS AND MULTIVARIATE TECHNIQUES [J].
BERNARD, PC ;
VANGRIEKEN, RE ;
EISMA, D .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1986, 20 (05) :467-473
[3]   MIXTURE MODEL TESTS OF CLUSTER-ANALYSIS - ACCURACY OF 4 AGGLOMERATIVE HIERARCHICAL METHODS [J].
BLASHFIELD, RK .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1976, 83 (03) :377-388
[4]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[5]  
Cunningham K.M., 1971, COMPUT J, V15, P209
[6]  
DEBEECK JO, 1975, ATOM ENERGY REV, V13, P743
[7]   UNRESOLVED PROBLEMS IN CLUSTER-ANALYSIS [J].
EVERITT, BS .
BIOMETRICS, 1979, 35 (01) :169-181
[8]   ADMISSIBLE CLUSTERING PROCEDURES [J].
FISHER, L ;
VANNESS, JW .
BIOMETRIKA, 1971, 58 (01) :91-&
[9]   LARGE SAMPLE STANDARD ERRORS OF KAPPA AND WEIGHTED KAPPA [J].
FLEISS, JL ;
COHEN, J ;
EVERITT, BS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1969, 72 (05) :323-&
[10]   MONTE CARLO STUDY OF ACCURACY OF A HIERARCHICAL GROUPING PROCEDURE [J].
GROSS, AL .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1972, 7 (03) :379-389