MIMD DIVIDE-AND-CONQUER ALGORITHMS FOR THE DISTANCE TRANSFORMATION .1. CITY-BLOCK DISTANCE

被引:5
作者
EMBRECHTS, H [1 ]
ROOSE, D [1 ]
机构
[1] KATHOLIEKE UNIV LEUVEN,DEPT COMP WETENSCHAPPEN,B-3001 HEVERLEE,BELGIUM
关键词
DISTANCE TRANSFORMATION; MIMD MACHINES; DIVIDE AND CONQUER; IMAGE ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/0167-8191(95)00013-E
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We present parallel algorithms for the Distance Transformation (DT) with the City Block (CB) distance measure. They are 'divide-and-conquer' algorithms operating on an image that is divided into subregions. Locally calculated partial DTs are combined into global information from which the global DT can be calculated locally. The computational complexity of the two local phases is proportional to the number of subregion pixels. The execution time of the combination step varies, depending on the combining strategy, from proportional to the image perimeter to proportional to the subregion perimeter. This paper contains, for the DT with CB distance, a description of the algorithm, a complexity analysis, a discussion on load balance and timings on an iPSC/2 parallel computer.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1076
页数:26
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   DISTANCE TRANSFORMATIONS IN DIGITAL IMAGES [J].
BORGEFORS, G .
COMPUTER VISION GRAPHICS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, 1986, 34 (03) :344-371
[2]   DISTANCE TRANSFORMATIONS IN ARBITRARY DIMENSIONS [J].
BORGEFORS, G .
COMPUTER VISION GRAPHICS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, 1984, 27 (03) :321-345
[3]  
EMBRECHTS H, 1993, CVGIP-IMAG UNDERSTAN, V57, P155, DOI 10.1006/ciun.1993.1010
[4]   MIMD DIVIDE-AND-CONQUER ALGORITHMS FOR THE DISTANCE TRANSFORMATION .2. CHAMFER-3-4 DISTANCE [J].
EMBRECHTS, H ;
ROOSE, D .
PARALLEL COMPUTING, 1995, 21 (07) :1077-1096
[5]  
EMBRECHTS H, 1994, THESIS U LEUVEN BELG
[6]  
EMBRECHTS H, 1992, COMPUTER VISION ECCV, P387
[7]  
EMBRECHTS H, 1992, PARALLEL PROCESSING, P571
[8]  
EMBRECHTS H, IN PRESS CVGIP IMAGE
[9]  
Fox G. C., 1988, SOLVING PROBLEMS CON
[10]   PATH PLANNING ON A RING OF PROCESSORS [J].
MIGUET, S ;
ROBERT, Y .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER MATHEMATICS, 1990, 32 (1-2) :61-74