THE REASONING OF A GREAT METHODOLOGIST - BLAUG,MARK ON THE NATURE OF PARETIAN WELFARE ECONOMICS

被引:3
作者
HENNIPMAN, P
机构
[1] University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
来源
ECONOMIST | 1992年 / 140卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF01725238
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In various publications Blaug has upheld the view that Paretian welfare economics is normative, sharply criticising the opposite 'Archibald-Hennipman argument.' He has failed to refute this and to defend his position, with the allegation that positive welfare economics cannot exist, convincingly. His reasoning is marred by misunderstandings, inconsistencies, circularities and traces of essentialism. The normative conception is an ambiguous hybrid that cannot fulfil the pretension to offer definite prescriptions. It is advisable to regard allocation theory as belonging to positive economics; its normative application must drop its claim to represent welfare economics as whole.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 445
页数:33
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1955, KANT
  • [2] ARCHIBALD GC, 1959, ECONOMICA, V39, P316
  • [3] ON THE DEMISE OF PIGOVIAN ECONOMICS
    ASLANBEIGUI, N
    [J]. SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1990, 56 (03) : 616 - 627
  • [4] Baumol W., 1975, THEORY ENV POLICY
  • [5] BLACK RDC, 1986, IDEAS EC, P1
  • [6] BLAUG M, 1991, APPRAISING ECONOMIC THEORIES, P499
  • [7] Blaug M., 1978, EC THEORY RETROSPECT
  • [8] BLAUG M, 1980, METHODOLOGICAL APPRA
  • [9] Blaug M., 1980, METHODOLOGY EC
  • [10] Blaug M., 1985, PUBLIC CHOICE PUBLIC, P15