RELATIONSHIP OF AGE TO HISTOLOGIC GRADE IN PROSTATE-CANCER

被引:12
作者
BOREK, D
BUTCHER, D
HASSANEIN, K
HOLMES, F
机构
[1] UNIV KANSAS,MED CTR,DEPT MED,KANSAS CITY,KS 66103
[2] UNIV KANSAS,MED CTR,DEPT BIOMETRY,KANSAS CITY,KS 66103
[3] UNIV KANSAS,MED CTR,DEPT PATHOL,KANSAS CITY,KS 66103
关键词
aged; aged 80 and over; neoplasm staging;
D O I
10.1002/pros.2990160405
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We studied 4,968 cases of prostatic carcinoma to determine if there is a relationship between tumor grade and patient age at diagnosis. Cases were stratified into arbitrary age groups and classified as either better differentiated (Grades I and II) or worse differentiated (Grades III and IV). The 4,596 graded cases were distributed by stage as follows: Local 3,451 (75%), Regional 509 (11%), and Distant 636 (14%). When patients in all stages were considered together, the percentage of men with better differentiated tumors dropped from 77.8% of patients under 60 to 67.5% of patients 80 or older (P<0.00001). This trend for older patients to have more poorly differentiated tumors was also seen in patients with localized disease (P>0.0005). The fact that occult, biologically inactive prostate cancer is common in older men has led some to extrapolate that clinically apparent disease follows a more benign course in the elderly. Our findings suggest that, on the contrary, elderly men with clinically apparent disease have worse differentiated tumors than their younger counterparts. Copyright © 1990 Wiley‐Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 311
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   LONG-TERM SURVIVAL IN PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AGE AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR - A NATIONWIDE STUDY [J].
ADAMI, HO ;
NORLEN, BJ ;
MALKER, B ;
MEIRIK, O .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1986, 20 (02) :107-112
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1976, INT CLASSIFICATION D
[3]   TESTS FOR LINEAR TRENDS IN PROPORTIONS AND FREQUENCIES [J].
ARMITAGE, P .
BIOMETRICS, 1955, 11 (03) :375-386
[4]  
BRAWN PN, 1983, CANCER, V52, P246, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19830715)52:2<246::AID-CNCR2820520210>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-Q
[6]   HOW TO USE RIDIT ANALYSIS [J].
BROSS, IDJ .
BIOMETRICS, 1958, 14 (01) :18-38
[7]   PATHOLOGICAL FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE PROGNOSIS IN STAGE A PROSTATIC-CANCER - THE INFLUENCE OF EXTENT VERSUS GRADE [J].
CANTRELL, BB ;
DEKLERK, DP ;
EGGLESTON, JC ;
BOITNOTT, JK ;
WALSH, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1981, 125 (04) :516-520
[8]   A COMPARISON BY AGE OF DEATH RATES DUE TO PROSTATE CANCER ALONE [J].
COOK, GB ;
WATSON, FR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1968, 100 (05) :669-&
[9]   HISTOLOGIC GRADING OF PROSTATE-CANCER - A RETROSPECTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE OVERVIEW [J].
GARDNER, WA .
PROSTATE, 1982, 3 (06) :555-561
[10]   PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF TUMOR GRADE AND STAGE IN THE PATIENT WITH CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE [J].
GRAYHACK, JT ;
ASSIMOS, DG .
PROSTATE, 1983, 4 (01) :13-31