NATURAL-HISTORY OF CELLULAR-DEPOSITS ON THE ANTERIOR INTRAOCULAR-LENS SURFACE

被引:25
作者
SHAH, SM [1 ]
SPALTON, DJ [1 ]
机构
[1] ST THOMAS HOSP,MED EYE UNIT,CATARACT & REFRACT SURG RES UNIT,LONDON SE1 7EH,ENGLAND
关键词
GIANT CELL; INTRAOCULAR LENS SURFACE; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); SMALL CELL; SPECULAR MICROSCOPY;
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80542-1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Previous cytopathological studies have demonstrated the presence of cellular deposits on the poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraocular lens (IOL) surface. In this prospective study, IOL surface specular microscopy was used to document the natural history of these deposits in the first year following PMMA IOL implantation. Intraocular lens surface specular microscopy was performed 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after endocapsular cataract surgery in 27 otherwise normal eyes. Postoperatively, IOLs were assessed for the presence of inflammatory cells, with the number of cells graded from 0 (none) to 4 (many). Two inflammatory cell types were visualized: small and giant cells. Small cells were found on 81.5% of IOLs at 1 month, 73.1% at 3 months, and 30.4% at 12 months. Small cells were found in only small numbers (peak mean cell score of 1.26 +/- 0.94 at 1 month). Giant cells were found on 59.3% of lenses at 1 month, 73.1% at 3 months, and 39.1% at 12 months. The number of giant cells on each lens peaked at 3 months (mean cell score 2.0 +/- 1.55), when 50% of lenses achieved a giant cell score of 3 or 4. Inflammatory cell deposits are, therefore, a normal occurrence on the PMMA IOL surface for up to 1 year after surgery. This cellular response consists of two distinct processes: a small cell response, which peaks by 1 month, and a later giant cell response, which peaks at 3 months.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 471
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Ridley H, Intra-ocular acrylic lenses, Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK, 71, pp. 617-621, (1951)
[2]  
Mondino BJ, Nagata S, Glovsky MM, Activation of the alternative complement pathway by intraocular lenses, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 26, pp. 905-908, (1985)
[3]  
Jennette JC, Eifrig DE, Paranjape YB, The inflammatory response to secondary methylmethacrylate challenge in lens-implanted rabbits, Am Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J, 8, pp. 35-37, (1982)
[4]  
Apple DJ, Mamalis N, Loftfield K, Et al., Complications of intraocular lenses. A historical and histopathological review, Surv Ophthalmol, 29, pp. 1-54, (1984)
[5]  
McDonnell PJ, Green WR, Maumenee AE, Iliff WJ, Pathology of intraocular lenses in 33 eyes examined postmortem, Ophthalmology, 90, pp. 386-403, (1983)
[6]  
Ferguson VMG, Spalton DJ, Recovery of the bloodaqueous barrier after cataract surgery, Br J Ophthalmol, 75, pp. 106-110, (1991)
[7]  
Wolter JR, Lens implant cytology, Ophthalmic Surg, 13, pp. 939-942, (1982)
[8]  
Wolter JR, Foreign body giant cells on intraocular lens implants, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 219, pp. 103-111, (1982)
[9]  
Wolter JR, Cell life on the surface of lens implants, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 218, pp. 244-249, (1982)
[10]  
Ohara K, Biomicroscopy of surface deposits resembling foreign-body giant cells on implanted intraocular lenses, Am J Ophthalmol, 99, pp. 304-311, (1985)