ATOMIC ENVIRONMENT ENERGIES IN PROTEINS DEFINED FROM STATISTICS OF ACCESSIBLE AND CONTACT SURFACE-AREAS

被引:28
作者
DELARUE, M
KOEHL, P
机构
[1] INST PASTEUR,IMMUNOL STRUCT LAB,F-75015 PARIS,FRANCE
[2] CNRS,UPR 003,F-67400 ILLKIRCH GRAFFENS,FRANCE
关键词
KNOWLEDGE-BASED POTENTIALS; PROTEIN DATABASES; ATOMIC CONTACT AREAS; ASSESSING MODEL STRUCTURES;
D O I
10.1006/jmbi.1995.0328
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Atomic contact potentials are derived by statistical analysis of atomic surface contact areas versus atom type in a database of non-homologous protein structures. The atomic environment is characterized by the surface area accessible to solvent and the surface of contacts with polar and non-polar atoms. Four types of atoms are considered, namely neutral polar atoms from protein backbones and from protein side-chains, non-polar atoms and charged atoms. Potential energies Delta E(j)(E) are defined from the preference for an atom of type j to be in a given environment E compared to the expected value if everything was random; Boltzmann's law is then used to transform these preferences into energies. These new potentials very clearly discriminate misfolded from correct structural models. The performance of these potentials are critically assessed by monitoring the recognition of the native fold among a large number of alternative structural folding types (the hide-and-seek procedure), as well as by testing if the native sequence can be recovered from a large number of randomly shuffled sequences for a given 3D fold (a procedure similar to the inverse folding problem). We suggest that these potentials reflect the atomic short range non-local interactions in proteins. To characterise atomic solvation alone, similar potentials were derived as a function of the percentage of solvent-accessible area alone. These energies were found to agree reasonably well with the solvation formalism of Eisenberg and McLachlan.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 690
页数:16
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
ABAGYAN R, 1994, IN PRESS J COMP CHEM
[2]  
AVEYARD R, 1965, J COLLOID INTERF SCI, V20, P2255
[3]  
Baldwin Enoch P., 1994, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, V5, P396, DOI 10.1016/0958-1669(94)90048-5
[4]   AN IMPROVED PAIR POTENTIAL TO RECOGNIZE NATIVE PROTEIN FOLDS [J].
BAUER, A ;
BEYER, A .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 1994, 18 (03) :254-261
[5]   POLARITY AS A CRITERION IN PROTEIN DESIGN [J].
BAUMANN, G ;
FROMMEL, C ;
SANDER, C .
PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 1989, 2 (05) :329-334
[6]   SIZE DEPENDENCE OF THE SOLVATION FREE-ENERGIES OF LARGE SOLUTES [J].
BENNAIM, A ;
MAZO, RM .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1993, 97 (41) :10829-10834
[7]   SOLVATION - FROM SMALL TO MACRO MOLECULES [J].
BENNAIM, A .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1994, 4 (02) :264-268
[8]  
BENNAIM A, 1987, SOLVATION THERMODYNA
[9]   PROTEIN DATA BANK - COMPUTER-BASED ARCHIVAL FILE FOR MACROMOLECULAR STRUCTURES [J].
BERNSTEIN, FC ;
KOETZLE, TF ;
WILLIAMS, GJB ;
MEYER, EF ;
BRICE, MD ;
RODGERS, JR ;
KENNARD, O ;
SHIMANOUCHI, T ;
TASUMI, M .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1977, 112 (03) :535-542
[10]   SELECTION OF A REPRESENTATIVE SET OF STRUCTURES FROM BROOKHAVEN PROTEIN DATA-BANK [J].
BOBERG, J ;
SALAKOSKI, T ;
VIHINEN, M .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 1992, 14 (02) :265-276