A COMPARISON OF ANTIMICROBIAL SENSITIVITIES OF URINARY PATHOGENS FOR THE YEARS 1980 AND 1990

被引:10
作者
HANNAN, M
CORMICAN, M
FLYNN, J
机构
[1] Department of Medical Microbiology, University College Hospital, Galway
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03022582
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Urinary tract infection is a major cause of morbidity in both the hospital and community which often requires empirical therapy. We have retrospectively studied laboratory diagnosed urinary tract infections for the years 1980 and 1990 to document the common pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. In 1990 a significantly lower proportion of specimens yielded Proteus sp. or. Klebsiella sp. than was the case in 1980. This was true of specimens from both the hospital and the community. There was an increase in the proportion of specimens yielding Pseudomonas sp. and coagulase negative Staphylococci (CNS). Significant changes in the antimicrobial susceptibility of urinary pathogens are also noted. In particular a greater proportion of isolates from the community were sensitive to cephalothin in 1990, while fewer isolates were sensitive to nalidixic acid and gentamicin. greater proportion of isolates from hospital practice were sensitive to ampicillin,to cephalothin and to trimethoprim in 1990 while fewer isolates were sensitive to gentamicin. In relation to nitrofurantoin no significant change was noted. In respect of isolates from both community and hospital practice the agents ofloxacin, co amoxiclav (got available in 1980) and gentamicin are those which are most consistently active.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 501
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Morbidity statistics from general practice Third National Study 1981-82, (1986)
  • [2] Wilkie M.E., Almond M. K, Marsh F.P., Diagnosis and management of urinary tract infection in adults, British Medical Journal, 305, pp. 1137-1141, (1992)
  • [3] Leibovici L., Greenshtain S., Cohen O., Wysenbeek A.J., Toward improved empiric management of moderate to severe urinary tract infections, Archives of Internal Medicine, 152, pp. 2481-6, (1992)
  • [4] Blue A.P., Gordon D.L., Is primary sensitivity testing of urines valid?, Pathology, 23, pp. 149-52, (1991)
  • [5] Scully P.G., O'Shea B., Flanagan K.P., Falkiner F.R., Urinary tract infection in general practice: direct antibiotic sensitivity testing as a potential diagnostic method, Irish Journal of Medical Science, 159, pp. 98-100, (1990)
  • [6] Raz R., Rottensterich E., Boger S., Potasman I., Comparison of single-dose administration and three-day course of amoxycillin with clavulanic acid for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 35, pp. 1688-90, (1991)
  • [7] Bauer A.W., Kirby W.M.M., Sherris J.C., Turck M., Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardised single dick method, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 45, pp. 493-496, (1966)
  • [8] Gruneberg R.N., Changes in the antibiotic sensitivities of urinary pathogens, 1971-1989, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 26, pp. 3-11, (1990)
  • [9] Kosakai N., Kumamoto Y., Hirose T., Tanaka N., Hikichi Y., Shigeta S., Et al., Comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from urinary tract infections (1987). II. Background of patients, Japanese Journal of Antibiotics, 43, pp. 954-67, (1990)
  • [10] Vigg A., Jad C.Y., Bacteriology of community acquired urinary tract infection. Analysis of 1048 cases, Journal of the Association of Physicians India, 39, pp. 601-3, (1991)