DIVERSIFICATION BIAS - EXPLAINING THE DISCREPANCY IN VARIETY SEEKING BETWEEN COMBINED AND SEPARATED CHOICES

被引:237
作者
READ, D
LOEWENSTEIN, G
机构
[1] CARNEGIE MELLON UNIV,DEPT ENGN & PUBL POLICY,PITTSBURGH,PA 15213
[2] CARNEGIE MELLON UNIV,DEPT SOCIAL & DECIS SCI,PITTSBURGH,PA 15213
关键词
D O I
10.1037/1076-898X.1.1.34
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Recent research has revealed a pattern of choice characterized as a diversification bias: If people make combined choices of quantities of goods for future consumption, they choose more variety than if they make separate choices immediately preceding consumption. This phenomenon is explored in a series of experiments in which the researchers first eliminated several hypotheses that held that the discrepancy between combined and separate choice can be explained by traditional accounts of utility maximization. On the basis of results of further experiments, it was concluded that the diversification bias is largely attributable to 2 mechanisms: time contraction, which is the tendency to compress time intervals and treat long intervals as if they were short, and choice bracketing, which is the tendency to treat choices that are framed together differently from those that are framed apart. The researchers describe how the findings can be applied in the domains of marketing and consumer education.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 49
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   SPECIOUS REWARD - BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF IMPULSIVENESS AND IMPULSE CONTROL [J].
AINSLIE, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1975, 82 (04) :463-496
[2]  
Ainslie G., 1992, CHOICE TIME, P177
[3]  
Ainslie G., 1992, CHOICE TIME, P57
[4]  
Baddeley A. D., 1976, PSYCHOL MEMORY
[5]   DURATION NEGLECT IN RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATIONS OF AFFECTIVE EPISODES [J].
FREDRICKSON, BL ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 65 (01) :45-55
[6]  
GOURVILLE JT, 1994, MAY BEH DEC RES MAN
[7]  
KAHN B, 1991, J RETAILING, V3, P274
[8]  
Kahneman D., 1992, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, V5, P187, DOI 10.1002/bdm.3960050304
[9]   ANOMALIES - THE ENDOWMENT EFFECT, LOSS AVERSION, AND STATUS-QUO BIAS [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
KNETSCH, JL ;
THALER, RH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1991, 5 (01) :193-206
[10]   WHEN MORE PAIN IS PREFERRED TO LESS - ADDING A BETTER END [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
FREDRICKSON, BL ;
SCHREIBER, CA ;
REDELMEIER, DA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (06) :401-405