COMPARISON OF FIVE VARIABLE WEIGHTING PROCEDURES

[1] Boyce J. E., 1955, THESIS PURDUE U

[2] BURKET GR, 1964, PSYCHOMETRIC MONOGRA

[3] CLAUDY JG, 1969, THESIS U TENNESSEE

[4] CURETON EE, UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRI

[5] CURETON EE, 1950, EDUCATIONAL MEASUREM

[6] DOUGLASS HJ, 1958, THESIS PURDUE U

[7] GRAYBILL FA, 1961, INTRO LINEAR STATIST, V1

[8] THE RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF 4 TEST WEIGHTING METHODS IN MULTIPLE PREDICTION [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1959, 19 (01) : 103 - 114

[9] MARKS MR, 1966, SEP M AM PSYCH ASS

[10] MOSIER CI, 1951, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V11, P1

[1] Boyce J. E., 1955, THESIS PURDUE U

[2] BURKET GR, 1964, PSYCHOMETRIC MONOGRA

[3] CLAUDY JG, 1969, THESIS U TENNESSEE

[4] CURETON EE, UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRI

[5] CURETON EE, 1950, EDUCATIONAL MEASUREM

[6] DOUGLASS HJ, 1958, THESIS PURDUE U

[7] GRAYBILL FA, 1961, INTRO LINEAR STATIST, V1

[8] THE RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF 4 TEST WEIGHTING METHODS IN MULTIPLE PREDICTION [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1959, 19 (01) : 103 - 114

[9] MARKS MR, 1966, SEP M AM PSYCH ASS

[10] MOSIER CI, 1951, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V11, P1