The consent problem within DNA biobanks

被引:58
作者
Shickle, Darren [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Inst Hlth Sci & Publ Hlth Res, 71-75 Clarendon Rd, Leeds LS2 9PL, W Yorkshire, England
来源
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES | 2006年 / 37卷 / 03期
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Biobanks; DNA; Informed consent; Waived consent; Blanket consent;
D O I
10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.06.007
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Large prospective biobanks are being established containing DNA, lifestyle and health information in order to study the relationship between diseases, genes and environment. Informed consent is a central component of research ethics protection. Disclosure of information about the research is an essential element of seeking informed consent. Within biobanks, it is not possible at recruitment to describe in detail the information that will subsequently be collected because people will not know which disease they will develop. It will also be difficult to describe the specific research that will be performed using the biobank, other than to stipulate categories of research or diseases that are not included. Potential subjects can only be given information about the sorts of research that will be performed and by whom. Organisations responsible for biobanks usually argue that this disclosure of information is adequate when seeking informed consent, especially if coupled with a right to withdraw, as it would not be feasible or it would be too expensive to seek consent renewal on a regular basis. However, there are concerns about this 'blanket consent' approach'. Consent waivers have also been proposed in which research subjects entrust their consent with an independent third party to decide whether subsequent research using the biobank is consistent with the original consent provided by the subject. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 519
页数:17
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, 1995, FIN REP
[2]  
Beauchamp Tom L., 1977, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA
[3]  
Bok S., 1978, LYING MORAL CHOICE P
[4]  
CAULFIELD T, 2003, BMC MED ETHICS, V4
[5]  
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences World Health Organization, 2002, INT ETH GUID BIOM RE
[6]  
Cragg Ross Dawson, 2000, PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS C
[7]   Human genetic research, DNA banking and consent:: a question of 'form'? [J].
Deschênes, M ;
Cardinal, G ;
Knoppers, BM ;
Glass, KC .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2001, 59 (04) :221-239
[8]  
Dworkin G., 1988, THEORY PRACTICE AUTO
[9]   Population genetics - Estonia prepares for national DNA database [J].
Frank, L .
SCIENCE, 2000, 290 (5489) :31-31
[10]  
*GALL ORG I HLTH F, 2000, PUBL ATT MED PRIV