SACCADIC SUPPRESSION AND STIMULUS UNCERTAINTY

被引:8
作者
GREENHOUSE, DS
COHN, TE
机构
[1] School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, CA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION | 1991年 / 8卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1364/JOSAA.8.000587
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Saccadic suppression is a decline in detectability of a weak flash presented during a saccadic eye movement. We examined the hypothesis of Matin [Psychol. Bull. 81, 899 (1974)] that saccadic suppression may be due to increased stimulus uncertainty during the saccade. Uncertainty could arise from variability and inhomogeneities in the visual frame of reference translation that must accompany a saccade. We measured an average 0.6-log-unit suppression for a brief foveal 1-degrees flash in a light-adapted detection task. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) slopes for flash detection during saccades, compared with those when fixating, were reduced, indicating the presence of increased uncertainty. The magnitude of this uncertainty change was estimated and found to be consistent with that required to account for the measured detectability decline. When a flashed pedestal was employed to reduce the effect of uncertainty, there was no saccadic suppression and no ROC slope change. Also, spatially separate flashed markers, intended to reduce uncertainty, led to a significant reduction in saccadic suppression for one of two subjects. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that a saccade leaves the observer with increased uncertainty as to which subjective visual direction to attend for a stimulus of fixed retinal locus. The magnitude of this uncertainty change can account fully for the saccadic suppression measured.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 595
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   FAILURE TO DETECT DISPLACEMENT OF VISUAL WORLD DURING SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENTS [J].
BRIDGEMAN, B ;
HENDRY, D ;
STARK, L .
VISION RESEARCH, 1975, 15 (06) :719-722
[2]   SACCADIC OMISSION - WHY WE DO NOT SEE A GREY-OUT DURING A SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENT [J].
CAMPBELL, FW ;
WURTZ, RH .
VISION RESEARCH, 1978, 18 (10) :1297-1303
[3]   VISUAL SENSITIVITY [J].
COHN, TE ;
LASLEY, DJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 37 :495-521
[4]   DETECTABILITY OF A LUMINANCE INCREMENT [J].
COHN, TE ;
THIBOS, LN ;
KLEINSTEIN, RN .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1974, 64 (10) :1321-1327
[5]   DETECTABILITY OF A LUMINANCE INCREMENT - EFFECT OF SPATIAL UNCERTAINTY [J].
COHN, TE ;
LASLEY, DJ .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1974, 64 (12) :1715-1721
[6]   EFFECT OF LARGE SPATIAL UNCERTAINTY ON FOVEAL LUMINANCE INCREMENT DETECTABILITY [J].
COHN, TE ;
WARDLAW, JC .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1985, 2 (06) :820-825
[7]   SITE OF THE ACCELERATING NONLINEARITY UNDERLYING LUMINANCE-CHANGE DETECTION [J].
COHN, TE ;
LASLEY, DJ .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1985, 2 (02) :202-205
[8]  
DODGE R, 1900, PSYCHOL REV, V2, P193
[9]   DETECTION AND RECOGNITION [J].
GREEN, DM ;
BIRDSALL, TG .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 85 (03) :192-206
[10]   DETECTION OF MULTIPLE COMPONENT SIGNALS IN NOISE [J].
GREEN, DM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1958, 30 (10) :904-911