PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST WOUND-INFECTION FOLLOWING HERNIORRHAPHY OR BREAST SURGERY

被引:57
作者
PLATT, R
ZUCKER, JR
ZALEZNIK, DF
HOPKINS, CC
DELLINGER, EP
KARCHMER, AW
BRYAN, CS
BURKE, JF
WIKLER, MA
MARINO, SK
HOLBROOK, KF
TOSTESON, TD
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT MED,BOSTON,MA 02115
[2] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT SURG,BOSTON,MA 02115
[3] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,INFECT CONTROL UNIT,BOSTON,MA 02115
[4] BETH ISRAEL HOSP,DEPT MED,BOSTON,MA 02215
[5] BETH ISRAEL HOSP,INFECT CONTROL UNIT,BOSTON,MA 02215
[6] NEW ENGLAND DEACONESS HOSP,DEPT MED,BOSTON,MA 02215
[7] NEW ENGLAND DEACONESS HOSP,INFECT CONTROL UNIT,BOSTON,MA 02215
[8] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP,DEPT MED,BOSTON,MA 02114
[9] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP,DEPT SURG,BOSTON,MA 02114
[10] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP,INFECT CONTROL UNIT,BOSTON,MA 02114
[11] UNIV WASHINGTON,DEPT SURG,SEATTLE,WA 98195
[12] UNIV WASHINGTON,HARBORVIEW MED CTR,SEATTLE,WA 98104
[13] UNIV S CAROLINA,DEPT MED,COLUMBIA,SC 29208
[14] SK&F LABS,DIV ANTIINFECT,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19101
关键词
D O I
10.1093/infdis/166.3.556
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The effect of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on definite wound infections was assessed for 3202 herniorrhaphies or selected breast surgery procedures. Patients were identified preoperatively and monitored for greater-than-or-equal-to 4 weeks. Thirty-four percent of patients (1077/3202) received prophylaxis at the discretion of the surgeon; 86 definite wound infections (2.7%) were identified. Prophylaxis recipients were at higher risk for infection, with a higher proportion of mastectomies, longer procedures, and other factors. Patients who received prophylaxis experienced 41% fewer definite wound infections (odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.99; P = .04) and 65% fewer definite wound infections requiring parenteral antibiotic therapy (OR, 0.35; 95% Cl, 0.15-0.88; P = .02) after adjustment for duration of surgery and type of procedure. Additional adjustment for age, body mass index, the presence of drains, diabetes, and exposure to corticosteroids did not change the magnitude of this effect meaningfully. The effect of prophylaxis was similar for all procedures studied. In the absence of formal guidelines, surgeons at these institutions administered prophylaxis preferentially to patients at highest risk.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 560
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
GARNER JS, 1988, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V16, P129
[2]  
HOPKINS CC, 1991, REV INFECT DIS, V13, pS869
[3]  
KAISER AB, 1986, NEW ENGL J MED, V315, P1129
[4]  
MEAKINS JL, 1988, CARE SURGICAL PATIEN, V6, P19
[5]  
PLATT R, 1991, REV INFECT DIS, V13, pS810
[6]   PERIOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS FOR HERNIORRHAPHY AND BREAST SURGERY [J].
PLATT, R ;
ZALEZNIK, DF ;
HOPKINS, CC ;
DELLINGER, EP ;
KARCHMER, AW ;
BRYAN, CS ;
BURKE, JF ;
WIKLER, MA ;
MARINO, SK ;
HOLBROOK, KF ;
TOSTESON, TD ;
SEGAL, MR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 322 (03) :153-160
[7]   THE ISRAELI STUDY OF SURGICAL INFECTIONS (ISSI) .2. INITIAL COMPARISONS AMONG HOSPITALS WITH SPECIAL FOCUS ON HERNIA OPERATIONS [J].
SIMCHEN, E ;
WAX, Y ;
PEVSNER, B .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1988, 9 (06) :241-249
[8]  
WAGMAN LD, 1990, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V170, P12