TREATMENT DIFFERENCES AND OTHER PROGNOSTIC FACTORS RELATED TO BREAST-CANCER SURVIVAL - DELIVERY SYSTEMS AND MEDICAL OUTCOMES

被引:140
作者
LEEFELDSTEIN, A [1 ]
ANTONCULVER, H [1 ]
FELDSTEIN, PJ [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF IRVINE, COLL MED,DEPT MED,EPIDEMIOL PROGRAM, CANC SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM ORANGE CTY, IRVINE, CA 92717 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1994年 / 271卷 / 15期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.271.15.1163
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective.-To determine differences in and relative importance of treatment modalities by hospital type and their effect on survival of breast cancer patients. Design.-Cohort of population-based cancer registry breast cancer patients diagnosed from 1984 through 1990. The analysis was done within this cohort, stratified by hospital type and treatment modality. Setting.-Orange County, California, residents diagnosed and treated for breast cancer in 126 hospitals (small community, large community, health maintenance organization [HMO], or teaching). Patients.-A total of 5892 non-Hispanic white women with no known prior cancer and with localized or regional, histologically confirmed breast cancer. Main Outcome Measures.-Effects of treatment modality and hospital type on survival. Adjustments for differences in age, tumor size, number of positive lymph nodes, and histology were included in the analysis. Results.-Use of recommended breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was greatest among teaching hospitals, where more than 50% of patients with localized disease received BCS between 1988 and 1990 and 40% to 50% with regional disease received BCS between 1984 and 1990. At nonteaching hospitals, 30% or less of patients received BCS between 1984 and 1989, regardless of stage. Rates of survival after BCS were at least as good as rates of survival after total mastectomy, other factors being equal. Survival rates varied by hospital type for patients with localized disease, with significantly better rates at large community hospitals and significantly worse rates at HMO hospitals in comparison with small hospitals. Patients with regional disease at large hospitals had a significant survival advantage. Conclusions.-Greater use of BCS is strongly urged. Overall, large community hospitals had significantly better survival rates than small community and HMO hospitals. Further follow-up will determine if treatment and survival differences by hospital type persist.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1168
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   DEMOGRAPHIC PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER [J].
AALTOMAA, S ;
LIPPONEN, P ;
ESKELINEN, M .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1992, 31 (06) :635-640
[2]   THE RELATION BETWEEN SURVIVAL AND AGE AT DIAGNOSIS IN BREAST-CANCER [J].
ADAMI, HO ;
MALKER, B ;
HOLMBERG, L ;
PERSSON, I ;
STONE, B .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (09) :559-563
[3]  
ANTONCULVER H, 1988, CANCER RES, V48, P6580
[4]  
AYRANIAN JZ, 1993, NEW ENGL J MED, V329, P326
[5]  
BARTH RJ, 1991, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V126, P574
[6]   THE INFLUENCE OF AGE ON TREATMENT CHOICE AND SURVIVAL OF ELDERLY BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS IN SOUTH-EASTERN NETHERLANDS - A POPULATION-BASED STUDY [J].
BERGMAN, L ;
KLUCK, HM ;
VANLEEUWEN, FE ;
CROMMELIN, MA ;
DEKKER, G ;
HART, AAM ;
COEBERGH, JWW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 28A (8-9) :1475-1480
[7]   CASE-SURVIVAL RATES FOR INFILTRATING DUCTAL CARCINOMAS BY CATEGORY OF HOSPITAL AT DIAGNOSIS IN SOUTH-AUSTRALIA [J].
BONETT, A ;
RODER, D ;
ESTERMAN, A .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1991, 154 (10) :695-697
[8]   HOSPITAL CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH ADVERSE EVENTS AND SUBSTANDARD CARE [J].
BRENNAN, TA ;
HEBERT, LE ;
LAIRD, NM ;
LAWTHERS, A ;
THORPE, KE ;
LEAPE, LL ;
LOCALIO, AR ;
LIPSITZ, SR ;
NEWHOUSE, JP ;
WEILER, PC ;
HIATT, HH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 265 (24) :3265-3269
[9]  
CARTER CL, 1989, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V63, P181, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-H