CRUSTAL STRUCTURE, GEOPHYSICAL MODELS AND CONTEMPORARY TECTONISM OF THE COLORADO PLATEAU

被引:61
作者
KELLER, GR
BRAILE, LW
MORGAN, P
机构
[1] PURDUE UNIV,DEPT GEOSCI,W LAFAYETTE,IN 47907
[2] NEW MEXICO STATE UNIV,DEPT EARTH SCI,LAS CRUCES,NM 88003
[3] NEW MEXICO STATE UNIV,DEPT PHYS,LAS CRUCES,NM 88003
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0040-1951(79)90295-6
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Surface wave dispersion and seismic refraction data show that the crust of the interior of Colorado Plateau is approximately 45 km thick. This thickness is significantly greater than that found in the Basin and Range Province (~30 km) which bounds the plateau on the west and south. Results from recent seismic studies indicate that the Rio Grande rift, which bounds the plateau on the east, also has a thinner crust (30-35 km) than the plateau. The northern boundary of the plateau is apparently not associated with a major change in crustal thickness. In general, belts of active seismicity and late Cenozoic faulting and volcanism are associated with those boundaries of the Colorado Plateau which involve substantial crustal thinning. At both the northwestern and southwestern boundaries of the plateau, seismic data indicate that thinner Basin and Range crust extends as much as 100 km into the plateau. Thus, it appears that zones of extension (rifting?) bounding the plateau appear to be growing at the plateau's expense. Surface wave and seismic refraction data indicate that the crustal structure of the interior of the Colorado Plateau is typical of stable continental areas. However, Pn (upper mantle) velocities appear to be lower (7.8 km s-1) than would be expected in a stable region. Silica geothermometry indicates that the average heat flow for the plateau is 55 mWm-2 (1.3 HFU). Thermal and gravity models of the plateau indicate the thickness of the lithosphere to be approximately 60 km, a thickness which is intermediate between those of the Basin and Range and Great Plains. This thickness for the lithosphere is consistent with both seismic and electrical conductivity data and may explain the elevation difference between the Colorado Plateau and the Great Plains. © 1979.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 147
页数:17
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] FINE STRUCTURE OF UPPER MANTLE
    ARCHAMBE.CB
    FLINN, EA
    LAMBERT, DG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1969, 74 (25): : 5825 - &
  • [2] BERG JW, 1960, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V50, P411
  • [3] DENSITY + COMPOSITION OF MANTLE + CORE
    BIRCH, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1964, 69 (20): : 4377 - +
  • [4] BLOCH S, 1968, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V58, P1021
  • [5] BOWMAN PL, 1978, NAS522816 NASA CONTR
  • [6] CRUSTAL STRUCTURE ACROSS WASATCH FRONT FROM DETAILED SEISMIC REFRACTION STUDIES
    BRAILE, LW
    SMITH, RB
    KELLER, GR
    WELCH, RM
    MEYER, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1974, 79 (17): : 2669 - 2677
  • [7] BRAILE LW, 1975, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V65, P71
  • [8] BRAILE LW, 1976, T AM GEOPHYS UNION, V57, P951
  • [9] SURFACE WAVE RADIATION PATTERNS FOR UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS AND SMALL-MAGNITUDE EARTHQUAKES
    BRUNE, JN
    POMEROY, PW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1963, 68 (17): : 5005 - +
  • [10] BUCHER RL, 1971, STRUCTURE PHYSICAL P, V14, P57