Emergence times of deutogynes of the pear rust mite, Epitrimerus pyri Nalepa, from overwintering sites on branches of pear, Pyrus communuis L., were compared between laboratory-stored (constant 1-degrees-C) and field-wintered branches at 2-4-wk intervals over 20 wk. Until wk 16, which corresponded to 1 March, 1992, the mean time to 50% emergence of mites declined steadily and was not significantly different between the two groups of branches. After wk 16, the mean time to median emergence of mites from field-wintered branches continued to decline, but there was no further decline iii the emergence time of mites from laboratory-stored branches, resulting in a significant difference between the two groups. This divergence of the emergence times of mites from laboratory-stored and field-wintered branches after wk 16 indicated that field-wintered mites had begun ''post-diapause'' development or reactivation after almost-equal-to 1 March. Emergence rates of individual mites from branches held at 1-degrees-C for 20 wk were compared at seven constant temperatures: 5.3, 7.8, 10.6, 13.3, 15.5, 17.6, and 20.8-degrees-C. Weighted, least squares linear regression was used to describe the relationship between emergence rate and temperature (rate = - 0.1008 + 0.0162[temp]) for prediction of emergence in the field. The base threshold temperature for emergence was 6.2-degrees-C, as determined by extrapolation of the regression line to the x-axis. The relationship predicted that median (50%) emergence of mites requires 62 +/- 1 degree-days (+/- SE) above the base temperature. The degree-day model was validated using field phenology data collected at one and four sites in 1991 and 1992, respectively. Using a 6.0-degrees-C threshold temperature for emergence, and daily minimum-maximum air temperatures beginning 1 March, the model accurately (+/- 2 d) predicted the 50% emergence point. This article discusses the use of the degree-day model to improve current pear rust mite management practices in British Columbia.