DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF IOMEPROL AND IOPAMIDOL IN CAROTID DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY

被引:4
作者
BELTRAMELLO, A
PIOVAN, E
ROSTA, L
机构
[1] Institute of Radiology, Verona University Hospital, Policlinico Borgo Roma, 37100 Verona, Via delle Menegone
[2] Department of Neuroradiology, Borgo Trento Hospital, Verona
关键词
CONTRAST MEDIA; EFFICACY STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ANGIOGRAPHY; DSA;
D O I
10.1016/0720-048X(94)90096-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Iomeprol is a nonionic monomer which provides injectable formulations with the lowest osmolalities and the lowest viscosities among the currently available low-osmolar radiographic contrast agents of the same category. These favourable physico-chemical characteristics, together with high water solubility and low molecular toxicity, make this agent particularly suitable for carotid angiography, a procedure in which contrast-induced blood-brain barrier damage is maximal. This single-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study aimed at comparing the safety, tolerance and efficacy of 200 mgI/ml solutions of iomeprol and iopamidol in 100 consenting adult inpatients undergoing carotid intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA). Both agents appeared to be safe and well tolerated. Only minor and transient adverse events occurred throughout the study. Electroencephalographic and neurological examinations performed pre- and post-contrast showed no abnormality induced by the test compounds. Vessel opacification was good or excellent in the vast majority of technically adequate examinations. Information provided by the angiographic examination was useful for subsequent patient management in almost all cases. It is concluded that iomeprol-200 and iopamidol-200 are safe and effective contrast media when used for carotid IA-DSA, an examination which proves useful not only for the diagnosis of vascular lesions, but also to best direct the management of patients scheduled for surgery of intracranial tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:S67 / S72
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Hemingway, Contrast media in angiography and digital subtraction angiography, Contrast media, pp. 104-110, (1988)
[2]  
Sage, Neuroangiography, Radiographic contrast agents, pp. 170-188, (1989)
[3]  
Swanson, Shetty, Kastan, Rollins, Angiographic contrast media, Pharmaceuticals in medical imaging, pp. 1-47, (1990)
[4]  
Sage, Wilcox, Evill, Benness, Comparison of blood-brain barrier disruption by intracarotid iopamidol and methylglucamine iothalamate, AJNR, 4, pp. 893-895, (1983)
[5]  
Aulie, Effect of iohexol, metrizamide and ioxaglate on the blood-brain barrier, Acta Radiol, 362, pp. 13-16, (1980)
[6]  
Wilson, Evill, Sage, Effects of nonionic contrast media on the blood-brain barrier: osmolality versus chemotoxicity, Invest Radiol, 26, pp. 1091-1094, (1991)
[7]  
Wilcox, Wilson, Evill, Sage, A comparison of blood-brain barrier disruption by intracarotid iohexol and iodixanol in the rabbit, AJNR, 8, pp. 769-772, (1987)
[8]  
Hayakawa, Yamashita, Mitsumori, Nakano, Blood-brain barrier injury following intracarotid injection of radiographic contrast media: in vivo quantification using magnetic resonance imaging and Gd. DTPA, Acta Radiol, 31, pp. 203-208, (1990)
[9]  
Eloy, Corot, Belleville, Contrast Media for angiography: physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics and biocompatibility, Clin Mater, 7, pp. 89-197, (1991)
[10]  
Lantos, Cortical blindness due to osmotic disruption of the blood-brain barrier by angiographic contrast material: CT and MRI studies, Neurology, 39, pp. 567-571, (1989)