FOCAL HEPATIC-LESIONS - COMPARATIVE MR IMAGING AT 0.5 AND 1.5 T

被引:45
作者
STEINBERG, HV [1 ]
ALARCON, JJ [1 ]
BERNARDINO, ME [1 ]
机构
[1] EMORY UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT RADIOL,1364 CLIFTON RD NE,ATLANTA,GA 30322
关键词
liver neoplasms; MR studies; magnetic resonance (MR); comparative studies; pulse sequences;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.174.1.2152980
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Twenty-nine patients with known or suspected malignancy were studied with identical T1-weighted (spin echo [SE] and inversion recovery [IR]) and T2-weighted SE magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T to evaluate the relative sensitivities of these sequences of these sequences for detecting focal hepatic lesions. At 0.5 T, 98 lesions were detected with the IR sequence, 86 with the T1-weighted SE sequence, and 96 with the T2-weighted sequence. At 1.5 T, 93 lEsions were detected with the IR sequence, 70 with the T1-weighted SE sequence, and 99 with the T2-weighted sequence. Although the lack of pathologic correlation precluded establishment of true sensitivity and specificity rates, data showed that magnetic field strength resulted in no significant difference for detecting focal hepatic lesions. No single sequence was shown to be significantly superior, although the T1-weighted SE sequence at 1.5 T was significantly inferior to the other sequences for detecting focal hepatic lesions. T1-weighted SE imaging at 0.5 T was significantly inferior to T1-weighted IR and T2-weighted imaging at both magnetic field strengths for detecting focal lesions in the left lobe of the liver. The authors conclude that T1-weighted IR and T2-weighted sequences alone will result in optimal MR imaging for the detection of focal hepatic lesions at 0.5 and 1.5 T.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 156
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] BOTTOMLEY PA, 1986, SOC MAGNETIC RESONAN, V2, P407
  • [2] LIVER AND ABDOMINAL SCREENING IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER - CT VERSUS MR IMAGING
    CHEZMAR, JL
    RUMANCIK, WM
    MEGIBOW, AJ
    HULNICK, DH
    NELSON, RC
    BERNARDINO, ME
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1988, 168 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [3] Conover W.J., 1999, PRACTICAL NONPARAMET, P428, DOI DOI 10.1002/BIMJ.19730150311
  • [4] CONTRAST OPTIMIZATION FOR THE DETECTION OF FOCAL HEPATIC-LESIONS BY MR IMAGING AT 1.5-T
    FOLEY, WD
    KNEELAND, JB
    CATES, JD
    KELLMAN, GM
    LAWSON, TL
    MIDDLETON, WD
    HENDRICK, RE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 149 (06) : 1155 - 1160
  • [5] EVALUATION OF FOCAL HEPATIC MASSES - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF MRI AND CT
    GLAZER, GM
    AISEN, AM
    FRANCIS, IR
    GROSS, BH
    GYVES, JW
    ENSMINGER, WD
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1986, 11 (03): : 263 - 268
  • [6] HEPATIC METASTASES STUDIED WITH MR AND CT
    HEIKEN, JP
    LEE, JKT
    GLAZER, HS
    LING, D
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1985, 156 (02) : 423 - 427
  • [7] OPTIMAL PULSE SEQUENCE FOR IMAGING HEPATIC METASTASES
    HENKELMAN, RM
    HARDY, P
    POON, PY
    BRONSKILL, MJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1986, 161 (03) : 727 - 734
  • [8] HUGHES KS, 1988, SURGERY, V103, P278
  • [9] FOCAL HEPATIC-LESIONS - DETECTION BY DYNAMIC AND DELAYED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY VERSUS SHORT TE/TR SPIN-ECHO AND FAST FIELD ECHO MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING
    NELSON, RC
    CHEZMAR, JL
    STEINBERG, HV
    TORRES, WE
    BAUMGARTNER, BR
    GEDGAUDASMCCLEES, RK
    BERNARDINO, ME
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1988, 13 (02): : 115 - 122
  • [10] LIVER METASTASES - DETECTION WITH MR IMAGING AT 0.5 AND 1.5T
    REINIG, JW
    DWYER, AJ
    MILLER, DL
    FRANK, JA
    ADAMS, GW
    CHANG, AE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (01) : 149 - 153