COMPARISON OF PHYSIOLOGICAL METHODS TO ASSESS DROUGHT TOLERANCE IN OATS

被引:16
作者
PELTONENSAINIO, P
MAKELA, P
机构
[1] Department of Plant Production, Section of Crop Husbandry, University of Helsinki, Viikki, FIN-00014
关键词
ABA; DROUGHT; DROUGHT RESISTANCE INDEXES; GRAIN YIELD; OATS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PROLINE; RELATIVE WATER CONTENT; TOLERANCE;
D O I
10.1080/09064719509410931
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Several methods have been developed to assess differences in cultivar response to drought. This study consisted of 19 oat (Avena sativa L.) cultivars and breeding lines and three species of wild oats, and focused on comparison of several physiological screening methods - CO2 exchange rate (CER), stomatal conductance, stomatal resistance, disparity between air and leaf temperatures, accumulation of abscisic acid (ABA) and proline, and relative water content (RWC) - with yield losses. Early drought, occurring at four-five leaf stage or close to pollination date resulted in significantly reduced above-ground vegetative biomass and panicle weight. Reductions in panicle weight due to drought were greater than those in vegetative phytomass, which resulted in decreased harvest index (HI). Drought stress significantly increased stomatal resistance and accumulation of ABA and proline, whereas stomatal conductance, disparity between air and leaf temperatures and RWC, decreased owing to water deficit. Comparison of screening methods by calculating drought tolerance indices showed that none of the indices was associated with degree of yield losses. However, photosynthetic characters correlated with RWC both at early growth stages and close to pollination. Therefore, further studies that profoundly evaluate the relationship between these screening methods and degree of yield losses are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 38
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ACTA AGR FENN
[2]  
BUSHUK W, 1989, DROUGHT RESISTANCE IN CEREALS, P191
[3]   YIELD POTENTIAL AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE OF SEGREGATING POPULATIONS OF BARLEY IN CONTRASTING ENVIRONMENTS [J].
CECCARELLI, S .
EUPHYTICA, 1987, 36 (01) :265-273
[4]  
Fischer R. A., 1980, Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress., P323
[5]   SOIL-WATER STATUS AFFECTS THE STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE OF FULLY TURGID WHEAT AND SUNFLOWER LEAVES [J].
GOLLAN, T ;
PASSIOURA, JB ;
MUNNS, R .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 13 (04) :459-464
[6]   EVALUATION OF FREE PROLINE ACCUMULATION AS AN INDEX OF DROUGHT RESISTANCE USING 2 CONTRASTING BARLEY CULTIVARS [J].
HANSON, AD ;
NELSEN, CE ;
EVERSON, EH .
CROP SCIENCE, 1977, 17 (05) :720-726
[7]  
Heathcote R. L., 1988, GeoJournal, V16, P387, DOI 10.1007/BF00214396
[8]   CANOPY TEMPERATURE AS A CROP WATER-STRESS INDICATOR [J].
JACKSON, RD ;
IDSO, SB ;
REGINATO, RJ ;
PINTER, PJ .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1981, 17 (04) :1133-1138
[9]  
KETATA H, 1987, DROUGHT TOLERANCE WI, P55